Species | Target name | Source | Bibliographic reference |
---|---|---|---|
Homo sapiens | polymerase (DNA directed), beta | Starlite/ChEMBL | No references |
Homo sapiens | SMAD family member 2 | Starlite/ChEMBL | No references |
Species | Potential target | Known druggable target | Length | Alignment span | Identity |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Brugia malayi | MH2 domain containing protein | SMAD family member 2 | 467 aa | 405 aa | 31.6 % |
Trypanosoma cruzi | mitochondrial DNA polymerase beta-PAK, putative | polymerase (DNA directed), beta | 335 aa | 303 aa | 32.3 % |
Species | Potential target | Raw | Global | Species |
---|---|---|---|---|
Loa Loa (eye worm) | MH2 domain-containing protein | 0.0144 | 0.279 | 0.5 |
Brugia malayi | MH2 domain containing protein | 0.0144 | 0.279 | 0.5 |
Mycobacterium tuberculosis | Conserved hypothetical protein | 0.0192 | 0.4357 | 0.5 |
Trypanosoma cruzi | mitochondrial DNA polymerase beta-PAK, putative | 0.0173 | 0.372 | 0.3643 |
Loa Loa (eye worm) | transcription factor SMAD2 | 0.0144 | 0.279 | 0.5 |
Mycobacterium ulcerans | hypothetical protein | 0.0192 | 0.4357 | 0.5 |
Activity type | Activity value | Assay description | Source | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|
Potency (functional) | 2.8184 uM | PUBCHEM_BIOASSAY: qHTS for Inhibitors of TGF-b. (Class of assay: confirmatory) [Related pubchem assays (depositor defined):AID588856, AID588860] | ChEMBL. | No reference |
Potency (functional) | = 3.9811 um | PUBCHEM_BIOASSAY: qHTS Assay for Inhibitors of DNA Polymerase Beta. (Class of assay: confirmatory) | ChEMBL. | No reference |
Potency (functional) | 4.1475 uM | PUBCHEM_BIOASSAY: Primary qHTS for delayed death inhibitors of the malarial parasite plastid, 96 hour incubation. (Class of assay: confirmatory) [Related pubchem assays (depositor defined):AID488745, AID488752, AID488774, AID504848, AID504850] | ChEMBL. | No reference |
Potency (functional) | 9.285 uM | PUBCHEM_BIOASSAY: Primary qHTS for delayed death inhibitors of the malarial parasite plastid, 48 hour incubation. (Class of assay: confirmatory) [Related pubchem assays (depositor defined):AID488752, AID488774, AID504848, AID504850] | ChEMBL. | No reference |
Potency (functional) | 25.1189 uM | PubChem BioAssay. qHTS for Agonist of gsp, the Etiologic Mutation Responsible for Fibrous Dysplasia/McCune-Albright Syndrome: qHTS. (Class of assay: confirmatory) | ChEMBL. | No reference |
Potency (functional) | 28.1838 uM | PubChem BioAssay. qHTS of GLP-1 Receptor Inverse Agonists (Inhibition Mode). (Class of assay: confirmatory) | ChEMBL. | No reference |
Potency (functional) | 44.6684 uM | PubChem BioAssay. qHTS for Inhibitors of ATXN expression. (Class of assay: confirmatory) | ChEMBL. | No reference |
Potency (binding) | = 50.1187 um | PUBCHEM_BIOASSAY: qHTS Assay for Identification of Novel General Anesthetics. In this assay, a GABAergic mimetic model system, apoferritin and a profluorescent 1-aminoanthracene ligand (1-AMA), was used to construct a competitive binding assay for identification of novel general anesthetics (Class of assay: confirmatory) [Related pubchem assays: 2385 (Probe Development Summary for Identification of Novel General Anesthetics), 2323 (Validation apoferritin assay run on SigmaAldrich LOPAC1280 collection)] | ChEMBL. | No reference |
Potency (functional) | 89.1251 uM | PUBCHEM_BIOASSAY: HTS for Inhibitors of HP1-beta Chromodomain Interactions with Methylated Histone Tails. (Class of assay: confirmatory) [Related pubchem assays (depositor defined):AID488962] | ChEMBL. | No reference |
Potency (functional) | 100 uM | PUBCHEM_BIOASSAY: qHTS for Inhibitors of Polymerase Iota. (Class of assay: confirmatory) [Related pubchem assays (depositor defined):AID588623] | ChEMBL. | No reference |
Species name | Source | Reference | Is orphan |
---|---|---|---|
Plasmodium falciparum | ChEMBL23 |
Many chemical entities in TDR Targets come from high-throughput screenings with whole cells or tissue samples, and not all assayed compounds have been tested against a single a single target protein, probably because they get ruled out during screening process. Even if these compounds may have not been of interest in the original screening, they may come as interesting leads for other screening assays. Furthermore, we may be able to propose drug-target associations using chemical similarities and network patterns.