Species | Target name | Source | Bibliographic reference |
---|---|---|---|
Homo sapiens | polymerase (DNA directed) iota | Starlite/ChEMBL | No references |
Homo sapiens | TAR DNA binding protein | Starlite/ChEMBL | No references |
Species | Potential target | Raw | Global | Species |
---|---|---|---|---|
Trichomonas vaginalis | DNA polymerase eta, putative | 0.0023 | 0 | 0.5 |
Trypanosoma brucei | DNA polymerase kappa, putative | 0.0023 | 0 | 0.5 |
Giardia lamblia | DINP protein human, muc B family | 0.0023 | 0 | 0.5 |
Trypanosoma brucei | DNA polymerase IV, putative | 0.0023 | 0 | 0.5 |
Trypanosoma cruzi | DNA polymerase kappa, putative | 0.0023 | 0 | 0.5 |
Entamoeba histolytica | deoxycytidyl transferase, putative | 0.0023 | 0 | 0.5 |
Trypanosoma brucei | DNA polymerase kappa, putative | 0.0023 | 0 | 0.5 |
Leishmania major | DNA polymerase eta, putative | 0.0023 | 0 | 0.5 |
Trypanosoma brucei | DNA polymerase kappa, putative | 0.0023 | 0 | 0.5 |
Trypanosoma cruzi | DNA polymerase kappa, putative | 0.0023 | 0 | 0.5 |
Leishmania major | DNA polymerase kappa, putative | 0.0023 | 0 | 0.5 |
Trypanosoma brucei | DNA polymerase kappa, putative | 0.0023 | 0 | 0.5 |
Brugia malayi | TAR-binding protein | 0.0076 | 1 | 1 |
Mycobacterium ulcerans | DNA polymerase IV | 0.0023 | 0 | 0.5 |
Trypanosoma brucei | unspecified product | 0.0023 | 0 | 0.5 |
Trypanosoma brucei | DNA polymerase kappa, putative | 0.0023 | 0 | 0.5 |
Trypanosoma brucei | DNA polymerase kappa, putative | 0.0023 | 0 | 0.5 |
Trypanosoma brucei | DNA polymerase IV, putative | 0.0023 | 0 | 0.5 |
Trypanosoma brucei | DNA polymerase IV, putative | 0.0023 | 0 | 0.5 |
Trypanosoma brucei | DNA polymerase kappa, putative | 0.0023 | 0 | 0.5 |
Mycobacterium tuberculosis | Conserved hypothetical protein | 0.0023 | 0 | 0.5 |
Leishmania major | DNA polymerase kappa, putative,DNA polymerase IV, putative | 0.0023 | 0 | 0.5 |
Trichomonas vaginalis | DNA polymerase IV / kappa, putative | 0.0023 | 0 | 0.5 |
Trypanosoma cruzi | DNA polymerase kappa, putative | 0.0023 | 0 | 0.5 |
Schistosoma mansoni | tar DNA-binding protein | 0.0076 | 1 | 1 |
Schistosoma mansoni | tar DNA-binding protein | 0.0076 | 1 | 1 |
Echinococcus multilocularis | tar DNA binding protein | 0.0076 | 1 | 1 |
Schistosoma mansoni | tar DNA-binding protein | 0.0076 | 1 | 1 |
Echinococcus granulosus | tar DNA binding protein | 0.0076 | 1 | 1 |
Loa Loa (eye worm) | RNA recognition domain-containing protein domain-containing protein | 0.0076 | 1 | 1 |
Trypanosoma cruzi | DNA polymerase kappa, putative | 0.0023 | 0 | 0.5 |
Schistosoma mansoni | tar DNA-binding protein | 0.0076 | 1 | 1 |
Trypanosoma brucei | DNA polymerase eta, putative | 0.0023 | 0 | 0.5 |
Mycobacterium ulcerans | DNA polymerase IV | 0.0023 | 0 | 0.5 |
Brugia malayi | RNA recognition motif domain containing protein | 0.0076 | 1 | 1 |
Trypanosoma cruzi | DNA polymerase eta, putative | 0.0023 | 0 | 0.5 |
Trypanosoma brucei | DNA polymerase kappa, putative | 0.0023 | 0 | 0.5 |
Trypanosoma brucei | DNA polymerase kappa, putative | 0.0023 | 0 | 0.5 |
Mycobacterium tuberculosis | Possible DNA-damage-inducible protein P DinP (DNA polymerase V) (pol IV 2) (DNA nucleotidyltransferase (DNA-directed)) | 0.0023 | 0 | 0.5 |
Loa Loa (eye worm) | RNA binding protein | 0.0076 | 1 | 1 |
Trypanosoma brucei | DNA polymerase kappa, putative | 0.0023 | 0 | 0.5 |
Schistosoma mansoni | tar DNA-binding protein | 0.0076 | 1 | 1 |
Loa Loa (eye worm) | TAR-binding protein | 0.0076 | 1 | 1 |
Activity type | Activity value | Assay description | Source | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|
Potency (functional) | 2.8184 uM | PUBCHEM_BIOASSAY: qHTS for Inhibitors of Polymerase Iota. (Class of assay: confirmatory) [Related pubchem assays (depositor defined):AID588623] | ChEMBL. | No reference |
Potency (functional) | 12.5893 uM | PubChem BioAssay. qHTS of TDP-43 Inhibitors. (Class of assay: confirmatory) | ChEMBL. | No reference |
Many chemical entities in TDR Targets come from high-throughput screenings with whole cells or tissue samples, and not all assayed compounds have been tested against a single a single target protein, probably because they get ruled out during screening process. Even if these compounds may have not been of interest in the original screening, they may come as interesting leads for other screening assays. Furthermore, we may be able to propose drug-target associations using chemical similarities and network patterns.