Species | Potential target | Raw | Global | Species |
---|---|---|---|---|
Echinococcus granulosus | bromodomain adjacent to zinc finger domain | 0.0038 | 0.1028 | 0.0911 |
Schistosoma mansoni | acetyl-CoA C-acetyltransferase | 0.0024 | 0.0128 | 0.0128 |
Schistosoma mansoni | bromodomain containing protein | 0.0067 | 0.2866 | 0.2866 |
Brugia malayi | Bromodomain containing protein | 0.004 | 0.1187 | 0.2673 |
Echinococcus multilocularis | bromodomain adjacent to zinc finger domain | 0.0063 | 0.2625 | 0.2529 |
Loa Loa (eye worm) | hypothetical protein | 0.0074 | 0.3366 | 1 |
Echinococcus granulosus | bromodomain adjacent to zinc finger domain | 0.0063 | 0.2625 | 0.2529 |
Echinococcus multilocularis | bromodomain adjacent to zinc finger domain | 0.0038 | 0.1028 | 0.0911 |
Loa Loa (eye worm) | hypothetical protein | 0.0045 | 0.1479 | 0.4395 |
Loa Loa (eye worm) | hypothetical protein | 0.004 | 0.1192 | 0.3541 |
Loa Loa (eye worm) | hypothetical protein | 0.0043 | 0.1351 | 0.4014 |
Brugia malayi | Bromodomain containing protein | 0.0079 | 0.3653 | 1 |
Activity type | Activity value | Assay description | Source | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|
Activity (functional) | = 0.74 g | Antitumor activity against mouse S180 cells xenografted in ICR mouse assessed as decrease in tumor weight at 89 umol/kg, ip administered 24 hrs after tumor implantation once daily for 7 consecutive days measured after 24 hrs last post dose | ChEMBL. | 19535177 |
Activity (functional) | = 1.22 g | Antitumor activity against mouse S180 cells xenografted in ICR mouse assessed as decrease in tumor weight at 0.89 umol/kg, ip administered 24 hrs after tumor implantation once daily for 7 consecutive days measured after 24 hrs last post dose | ChEMBL. | 19535177 |
Activity (functional) | = 1.64 g | Antitumor activity against mouse S180 cells xenografted in ICR mouse assessed as decrease in tumor weight at 0.0089 umol/kg, ip administered 24 hrs after tumor implantation once daily for 7 consecutive days measured after 24 hrs last post dose | ChEMBL. | 19535177 |
Activity (ADMET) | = 12.92 g | Toxicity in mouse S180 cells xenografted in ICR mouse assessed as increase in body weight at 89 umol/kg, ip administered 24 hrs after tumor implantation once daily for 7 consecutive days measured after 24 hrs last post dose | ChEMBL. | 19535177 |
Activity (ADMET) | = 13.32 mg Kg-1 | Toxicity in mouse S180 cells xenografted in ICR mouse assessed as spleen index at 89 umol/kg, ip administered 24 hrs after tumor implantation once daily for 7 consecutive days measured after 24 hrs last post dose | ChEMBL. | 19535177 |
IC50 (functional) | = 28.1 uM | Cytotoxicity against human HL60 cells after 48 hrs by MTT assay | ChEMBL. | 19535177 |
IC50 (functional) | = 122 uM | Cytotoxicity against human HeLa cells after 48 hrs by MTT assay | ChEMBL. | 19535177 |
IC50 (functional) | = 242 uM | Cytotoxicity against human HepG2 cells after 48 hrs by MTT assay | ChEMBL. | 19535177 |
Inhibition (functional) | = 1.5 % | Antitumor activity against mouse S180 cells xenografted in ICR mouse assessed as inhibition of tumor growth at 0.0089 umol/kg, ip administered 24 hrs after tumor implantation once daily for 7 consecutive days measured after 24 hrs last post dose | ChEMBL. | 19535177 |
Inhibition (functional) | = 25.6 % | Antitumor activity against mouse S180 cells xenografted in ICR mouse assessed as inhibition of tumor growth at 0.89 umol/kg, ip administered 24 hrs after tumor implantation once daily for 7 consecutive days measured after 24 hrs last post dose | ChEMBL. | 19535177 |
Inhibition (functional) | = 55.2 % | Antitumor activity against mouse S180 cells xenografted in ICR mouse assessed as inhibition of tumor growth at 89 umol/kg, ip administered 24 hrs after tumor implantation once daily for 7 consecutive days measured after 24 hrs last post dose | ChEMBL. | 19535177 |
Many chemical entities in TDR Targets come from high-throughput screenings with whole cells or tissue samples, and not all assayed compounds have been tested against a single a single target protein, probably because they get ruled out during screening process. Even if these compounds may have not been of interest in the original screening, they may come as interesting leads for other screening assays. Furthermore, we may be able to propose drug-target associations using chemical similarities and network patterns.