Species | Target name | Source | Bibliographic reference |
---|---|---|---|
Homo sapiens | Rho-associated, coiled-coil containing protein kinase 2 | Starlite/ChEMBL | No references |
Species | Potential target | Raw | Global | Species |
---|---|---|---|---|
Trichomonas vaginalis | replication factor A 1, rfa1, putative | 0.0154 | 0.2502 | 1 |
Leishmania major | replication factor A, 51kDa subunit, putative | 0.0074 | 0.0976 | 0.5 |
Entamoeba histolytica | replication factor A protein 1, putative | 0.0066 | 0.0832 | 0.5 |
Onchocerca volvulus | 0.0176 | 0.2928 | 1 | |
Plasmodium falciparum | replication protein A1, large subunit | 0.0074 | 0.0976 | 0.5 |
Loa Loa (eye worm) | AGC/DMPK/ROCK protein kinase | 0.0546 | 1 | 1 |
Giardia lamblia | Hypothetical protein | 0.0022 | 0 | 0.5 |
Trichomonas vaginalis | replication factor A 1, rfa1, putative | 0.0146 | 0.2358 | 0.9053 |
Loa Loa (eye worm) | replication factor A 73 kDa subunit | 0.0154 | 0.2502 | 0.2378 |
Trichomonas vaginalis | replication factor A 1, rfa1, putative | 0.0154 | 0.2502 | 1 |
Echinococcus granulosus | rho-associated protein kinase 1 | 0.0176 | 0.2928 | 1 |
Echinococcus multilocularis | rho associated protein kinase | 0.0176 | 0.2928 | 1 |
Plasmodium vivax | replication protein A1, large subunit, putative | 0.0074 | 0.0976 | 0.5 |
Onchocerca volvulus | 0.0175 | 0.2921 | 0.9903 | |
Toxoplasma gondii | replication factor-a protein 1 (rpa1) subfamily protein | 0.0074 | 0.0976 | 1 |
Brugia malayi | replication factor A 73 kDa subunit | 0.0154 | 0.2502 | 0.2378 |
Trypanosoma cruzi | Replication factor A protein 1 | 0.0074 | 0.0976 | 0.5 |
Schistosoma mansoni | serine/threonine protein kinase | 0.0176 | 0.2928 | 1 |
Trypanosoma brucei | Replication factor A protein 1 | 0.0074 | 0.0976 | 0.5 |
Activity type | Activity value | Assay description | Source | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|
IC50 (binding) | = 7.8 nM | BindingDB_Patents: Luciferin-Luciferase Assay. The activity of ROCKII (1-543) kinase was measured utilizing Cambrex PKLight ATP Detection Reagent, a homogeneous assay technology using luciferin-luciferase to quantify residual ATP. The assay was performed in 384-well low-volume, white, non- binding surface micro titer plates (Corning). The assay buffer was 25 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 10 mM MgCl2, 50 mM KC1, 0.2% BSA, 0.01% CHAPS, 100 uM Na3VO4 and 0.5 mM DTT. Test compounds, dissolved in neat DMSO at 500 ug/mL, were serially diluted for dose response for a final starting concentration of 3 ug/mL in 1% DMSO of assay buffer. ROCKII (1-543) (62,408Da) was diluted in assay buffer to a final concentration of 7.5 nM in a total volume of 15 ul. Positive controls were reaction mixtures containing no test compound; negative controls (blanks) were reaction mixtures containing no kinase. | ChEMBL. | No reference |
IC50 (binding) | = 9.7 nM | BindingDB_Patents: IMAP Assay. This assay is performed using FAM S6 substrate peptide (Catalogue #R7184) and IMAP FP Screening Express Kit detection reagents from Molecular Devices (Sunnyvale, CA) in IMAP kinase reaction buffer (Tris-HCl, pH 7.2, 10 mM MgC12 , 0.05% NaN3, 0.1% phosphate-free BSA) containing 1 mM DTT. Test compounds dissolved in neat DMSO at 0.3 mg/mL are serially diluted 1 to 3 for concentration response in 100% DMSO. The DMSO serial dilutions are further diluted 33.33-fold in kinase reaction buffer, and 10 μL of this buffer dilution is transferred to Corning black 96-well half area NBS plates for a final top concentration of 3 ug/mL in 1% DMSO. 10 aliquot of 3 nM ROCKII (1-543) diluted in kinase reaction buffer is added to each assay well for a final concentration of 1 nM kinase. 10 uL of a mixture of 600 nM FAM S6 peptide and 300 uM ATP diluted in kinase reaction buffer is added to each well for a final concentration of 200 nM peptide and 100 uM ATP. | ChEMBL. | No reference |
Many chemical entities in TDR Targets come from high-throughput screenings with whole cells or tissue samples, and not all assayed compounds have been tested against a single a single target protein, probably because they get ruled out during screening process. Even if these compounds may have not been of interest in the original screening, they may come as interesting leads for other screening assays. Furthermore, we may be able to propose drug-target associations using chemical similarities and network patterns.