Species | Target name | Source | Bibliographic reference |
---|---|---|---|
Homo sapiens | X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis, E3 ubiquitin protein ligase | Starlite/ChEMBL | No references |
Homo sapiens | baculoviral IAP repeat containing 2 | Starlite/ChEMBL | No references |
Species | Potential target | Raw | Global | Species |
---|---|---|---|---|
Schistosoma mansoni | hypothetical protein | 0.0122 | 1 | 1 |
Mycobacterium tuberculosis | Possible chitinase | 0.0066 | 0 | 0.5 |
Echinococcus granulosus | Hepatocellular carcinoma associated antigen 59 | 0.0122 | 1 | 1 |
Loa Loa (eye worm) | microfilarial chitinase | 0.0075 | 0.1641 | 0.1641 |
Loa Loa (eye worm) | chitinase I | 0.0077 | 0.2004 | 0.2004 |
Brugia malayi | Endochitinase | 0.0086 | 0.3645 | 0.2052 |
Mycobacterium ulcerans | chitinase/cellulase | 0.0066 | 0 | 0.5 |
Loa Loa (eye worm) | hypothetical protein | 0.0114 | 0.8569 | 0.8569 |
Brugia malayi | Inhibitor of Apoptosis domain containing protein | 0.0114 | 0.8569 | 0.821 |
Onchocerca volvulus | Putative endochitinase | 0.0086 | 0.3645 | 0.2052 |
Mycobacterium ulcerans | chitinase/cellulase | 0.0066 | 0 | 0.5 |
Echinococcus multilocularis | Hepatocellular carcinoma associated antigen 59 | 0.0122 | 1 | 1 |
Plasmodium falciparum | conserved protein, unknown function | 0.0122 | 1 | 0.5 |
Onchocerca volvulus | Putative endochitinase | 0.0086 | 0.3645 | 0.2052 |
Plasmodium vivax | hypothetical protein, conserved | 0.0122 | 1 | 0.5 |
Brugia malayi | Inhibitor of Apoptosis domain containing protein | 0.0114 | 0.8569 | 0.821 |
Brugia malayi | endochitinase | 0.0086 | 0.3645 | 0.2052 |
Toxoplasma gondii | hypothetical protein | 0.0122 | 1 | 0.5 |
Onchocerca volvulus | Putative endochitinase | 0.0086 | 0.3645 | 0.2052 |
Onchocerca volvulus | 0.0114 | 0.8569 | 0.821 | |
Onchocerca volvulus | 0.0122 | 1 | 1 | |
Leishmania major | chitinase | 0.0077 | 0.2004 | 0.5 |
Loa Loa (eye worm) | hypothetical protein | 0.0122 | 1 | 1 |
Loa Loa (eye worm) | cuticular endochitinase | 0.0077 | 0.2004 | 0.2004 |
Onchocerca volvulus | Deterin homolog | 0.0114 | 0.8569 | 0.821 |
Loa Loa (eye worm) | hypothetical protein | 0.0122 | 1 | 1 |
Loa Loa (eye worm) | hypothetical protein | 0.0114 | 0.8569 | 0.8569 |
Onchocerca volvulus | 0.0122 | 1 | 1 | |
Entamoeba histolytica | chitinase, putative | 0.0077 | 0.2004 | 0.5 |
Activity type | Activity value | Assay description | Source | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|
IC50 (binding) | = 17 nM | BindingDB_Patents: In vitro Competitive Displacement Binding Assays . Modified SMAC peptides and compounds were tested for their ability to displace the fluorescent tracer from either XIAP, clAP-1 or clAP-2. BIR3 domains of clAP-1 , clAP-2 and XIAP were incubated with test compounds or SMAC based peptides and their respective peptide probes (Peptide Protein Research) in assay buffer (50mM Hepes pH 7.5, 0.025% Tween-20, 0.01 % BSA, and 1 mM DTT). Positive controls consisted of BIR3 proteins and tracer (no inhibition) and negative controls contained tracer only (100% inhibition). The samples were incubated at room temperature for 1 hr (XIAP and clAP-2) or 3hrs (clAP-1 ) prior to being read in the BMG Pherastar in Fluorescence Polarization mode (FP 485nm, 520nm, 520nm). | ChEMBL. | No reference |
IC50 (binding) | = 75 nM | BindingDB_Patents: In vitro Competitive Displacement Binding Assays. Modified SMAC peptides and compounds were tested for their ability to displace the fluorescent tracer from either XIAP, clAP-1 or clAP-2. BIR3 domains of clAP-1 , clAP-2 and XIAP were incubated with test compounds or SMAC based peptides and their respective peptide probes (Peptide Protein Research) in assay buffer (50mM Hepes pH 7.5, 0.025% Tween-20, 0.01 % BSA, and 1 mM DTT). Positive controls consisted of BIR3 proteins and tracer (no inhibition) and negative controls contained tracer only (100% inhibition). The samples were incubated at room temperature for 1 hr (XIAP and clAP-2) or 3hrs (clAP-1 ) prior to being read in the BMG Pherastar in Fluorescence Polarization mode (FP 485nm, 520nm, 520nm). | ChEMBL. | No reference |
Many chemical entities in TDR Targets come from high-throughput screenings with whole cells or tissue samples, and not all assayed compounds have been tested against a single a single target protein, probably because they get ruled out during screening process. Even if these compounds may have not been of interest in the original screening, they may come as interesting leads for other screening assays. Furthermore, we may be able to propose drug-target associations using chemical similarities and network patterns.