Species | Target name | Source | Bibliographic reference |
---|---|---|---|
Homo sapiens | X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis, E3 ubiquitin protein ligase | Starlite/ChEMBL | No references |
Homo sapiens | baculoviral IAP repeat containing 2 | Starlite/ChEMBL | No references |
Species | Potential target | Raw | Global | Species |
---|---|---|---|---|
Onchocerca volvulus | Putative endochitinase | 0.0089 | 0.3645 | 0.2052 |
Echinococcus multilocularis | Hepatocellular carcinoma associated antigen 59 | 0.0126 | 1 | 1 |
Mycobacterium ulcerans | chitinase/cellulase | 0.0067 | 0 | 0.5 |
Brugia malayi | Endochitinase | 0.0089 | 0.3645 | 0.2052 |
Mycobacterium ulcerans | chitinase/cellulase | 0.0067 | 0 | 0.5 |
Brugia malayi | Inhibitor of Apoptosis domain containing protein | 0.0114 | 0.8085 | 0.7605 |
Loa Loa (eye worm) | hypothetical protein | 0.0114 | 0.8085 | 0.8085 |
Loa Loa (eye worm) | microfilarial chitinase | 0.0077 | 0.1641 | 0.1641 |
Echinococcus granulosus | Hepatocellular carcinoma associated antigen 59 | 0.0126 | 1 | 1 |
Loa Loa (eye worm) | chitinase I | 0.0079 | 0.2004 | 0.2004 |
Schistosoma mansoni | hypothetical protein | 0.0126 | 1 | 1 |
Mycobacterium tuberculosis | Possible chitinase | 0.0067 | 0 | 0.5 |
Loa Loa (eye worm) | hypothetical protein | 0.0114 | 0.8085 | 0.8085 |
Onchocerca volvulus | 0.0126 | 1 | 1 | |
Loa Loa (eye worm) | hypothetical protein | 0.0126 | 1 | 1 |
Onchocerca volvulus | Deterin homolog | 0.0114 | 0.8085 | 0.7605 |
Entamoeba histolytica | chitinase, putative | 0.0079 | 0.2004 | 0.5 |
Onchocerca volvulus | 0.0114 | 0.8085 | 0.7605 | |
Loa Loa (eye worm) | cuticular endochitinase | 0.0079 | 0.2004 | 0.2004 |
Onchocerca volvulus | 0.0126 | 1 | 1 | |
Loa Loa (eye worm) | hypothetical protein | 0.0126 | 1 | 1 |
Leishmania major | chitinase | 0.0079 | 0.2004 | 0.5 |
Onchocerca volvulus | Putative endochitinase | 0.0089 | 0.3645 | 0.2052 |
Onchocerca volvulus | Putative endochitinase | 0.0089 | 0.3645 | 0.2052 |
Brugia malayi | endochitinase | 0.0089 | 0.3645 | 0.2052 |
Brugia malayi | Inhibitor of Apoptosis domain containing protein | 0.0114 | 0.8085 | 0.7605 |
Plasmodium vivax | hypothetical protein, conserved | 0.0126 | 1 | 0.5 |
Toxoplasma gondii | hypothetical protein | 0.0126 | 1 | 0.5 |
Plasmodium falciparum | conserved protein, unknown function | 0.0126 | 1 | 0.5 |
Activity type | Activity value | Assay description | Source | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|
IC50 (binding) | = 45 nM | BindingDB_Patents: In vitro Competitive Displacement Binding Assays . Modified SMAC peptides and compounds were tested for their ability to displace the fluorescent tracer from either XIAP, clAP-1 or clAP-2. BIR3 domains of clAP-1 , clAP-2 and XIAP were incubated with test compounds or SMAC based peptides and their respective peptide probes (Peptide Protein Research) in assay buffer (50mM Hepes pH 7.5, 0.025% Tween-20, 0.01 % BSA, and 1 mM DTT). Positive controls consisted of BIR3 proteins and tracer (no inhibition) and negative controls contained tracer only (100% inhibition). The samples were incubated at room temperature for 1 hr (XIAP and clAP-2) or 3hrs (clAP-1 ) prior to being read in the BMG Pherastar in Fluorescence Polarization mode (FP 485nm, 520nm, 520nm). | ChEMBL. | No reference |
IC50 (binding) | = 360 nM | BindingDB_Patents: In vitro Competitive Displacement Binding Assays. Modified SMAC peptides and compounds were tested for their ability to displace the fluorescent tracer from either XIAP, clAP-1 or clAP-2. BIR3 domains of clAP-1 , clAP-2 and XIAP were incubated with test compounds or SMAC based peptides and their respective peptide probes (Peptide Protein Research) in assay buffer (50mM Hepes pH 7.5, 0.025% Tween-20, 0.01 % BSA, and 1 mM DTT). Positive controls consisted of BIR3 proteins and tracer (no inhibition) and negative controls contained tracer only (100% inhibition). The samples were incubated at room temperature for 1 hr (XIAP and clAP-2) or 3hrs (clAP-1 ) prior to being read in the BMG Pherastar in Fluorescence Polarization mode (FP 485nm, 520nm, 520nm). | ChEMBL. | No reference |
Many chemical entities in TDR Targets come from high-throughput screenings with whole cells or tissue samples, and not all assayed compounds have been tested against a single a single target protein, probably because they get ruled out during screening process. Even if these compounds may have not been of interest in the original screening, they may come as interesting leads for other screening assays. Furthermore, we may be able to propose drug-target associations using chemical similarities and network patterns.