Species | Target name | Source | Bibliographic reference |
---|---|---|---|
Toxoplasma gondii | bifunctional dihydrofolate reductase-thymidylate synthase | Curated by TDR Targets | References |
Homo sapiens | cysteinyl leukotriene receptor 2 | Starlite/ChEMBL | References |
Cavia porcellus | Cysteinyl leukotriene receptor 1 | Starlite/ChEMBL | References |
Homo sapiens | cysteinyl leukotriene receptor 1 | References |
Activity type | Activity value | Assay description | Source | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|
Activity (functional) | = 7.5 | LTD4 induced broncho constriction (shift in dose response curve 2 hr following 800 mg oral dose) | ChEMBL. | 8709092 |
Activity (functional) | = 7.5 | LTD4 induced broncho constriction (shift in dose response curve 2 hr following 800 mg oral dose) | ChEMBL. | 8709092 |
ED50 (functional) | = 2.2 mg kg-1 | Oral activity expressed as effective dose in leukotriene mediated anaphylaxis assay in guinea pig | ChEMBL. | 2157010 |
ED50 (functional) | = 2.2 mg kg-1 | The effective dose of the compound was tested for inhibition of anaphylactic death after oral administration | ChEMBL. | 1635053 |
ED50 (functional) | = 4.9 mg kg-1 | Oral activity expressed as effective dose in LTD4-induced wheal assay in guinea pig | ChEMBL. | 2157010 |
ED50 (functional) | = 5 mg kg-1 | The effective dose of the compound was tested for inhibition of LTD4-induced wheal formation after oral administration | ChEMBL. | 1635053 |
IC50 (functional) | = 2.7 nM | Inhibition of LTC4-induced contractions from guinea pig peripheral lung strips | ChEMBL. | 2157010 |
KB (functional) | = 2.7 nM | Compound was tested for spasmogenic activity of LTC4 on lung strips | ChEMBL. | 1635053 |
KB (functional) | = 2.7 nM | Compound was tested for spasmogenic activity of LTD4 on lung strips | ChEMBL. | 1635053 |
KB (functional) | = 2.7 nM | Compound was tested for spasmogenic activity of LTE4 on lung strips | ChEMBL. | 1635053 |
KB (binding) | = 3 nM | Binding affinity against Cysteinyl leukotriene D4 receptor from guinea pig lung was determined using [3H]-LTD4 (0.2 nM) at compound concentration of 1 uM | ChEMBL. | 2157010 |
Kb (binding) | = 3 nM | Binding affinity against Cysteinyl leukotriene D4 receptor from guinea pig lung was determined using [3H]-LTD4 (0.2 nM) at compound concentration of 1 uM | ChEMBL. | 2157010 |
Ki (binding) | = 3 nM | Binding affinity against Cysteinyl leukotriene D4 receptor | ChEMBL. | 8709092 |
Ki (binding) | = 3 nM | Binding affinity against Cysteinyl leukotriene D4 receptor from guinea pig lung was determined using [3H]-LTD4 (0.2 nM) | ChEMBL. | 2157010 |
Ki (binding) | = 3 nm | Binding affinity against LTD4 receptor in guinea pig lung membranes. | ChEMBL. | 1851845 |
Ki (binding) | = 3 nM | Compound was evaluated for its ability to displace [3H]-LTD4 from Cysteinyl leukotriene D4 receptor in guinea pig lung membranes | ChEMBL. | 1849993 |
Ki (functional) | = 3 nM | The compound was tested for inhibition of [3H]-LTD4 binding to lung membrane | ChEMBL. | 1635053 |
Ki (binding) | = 3 nM | Binding affinity against Cysteinyl leukotriene D4 receptor | ChEMBL. | 8709092 |
Ki (binding) | = 3 nM | Binding affinity against Cysteinyl leukotriene D4 receptor from guinea pig lung was determined using [3H]-LTD4 (0.2 nM) | ChEMBL. | 2157010 |
Ki (binding) | = 3 nm | Binding affinity against LTD4 receptor in guinea pig lung membranes. | ChEMBL. | 1851845 |
Ki (binding) | = 3 nM | Compound was evaluated for its ability to displace [3H]-LTD4 from Cysteinyl leukotriene D4 receptor in guinea pig lung membranes | ChEMBL. | 1849993 |
pA2 (functional) | = 8.4 | Compound was tested for LTD4 guinea pig trachea contraction. | ChEMBL. | 8709092 |
pA2 (functional) | = 8.4 | Antagonistic activity against LTD4 induced contraction in guinea pig lung parenchymal strips | ChEMBL. | 1849993 |
Many chemical entities in TDR Targets come from high-throughput screenings with whole cells or tissue samples, and not all assayed compounds have been tested against a single a single target protein, probably because they get ruled out during screening process. Even if these compounds may have not been of interest in the original screening, they may come as interesting leads for other screening assays. Furthermore, we may be able to propose drug-target associations using chemical similarities and network patterns.
5 literature references were collected for this gene.