Species | Target name | Source | Bibliographic reference |
---|---|---|---|
Sus scrofa | Endothelin receptor ET-B | Starlite/ChEMBL | References |
Sus scrofa | Endothelin receptor ET-A | Starlite/ChEMBL | References |
Species | Potential target | Known druggable target | Length | Alignment span | Identity |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Onchocerca volvulus | Endothelin receptor ET-B | 443 aa | 371 aa | 20.5 % | |
Schistosoma japonicum | ko:K04135 adrenergic receptor, alpha 1a, putative | Endothelin receptor ET-B | 443 aa | 392 aa | 23.5 % |
Species | Potential target | Raw | Global | Species |
---|---|---|---|---|
Brugia malayi | Protein kinase domain containing protein | 0.026 | 0.3288 | 0.3256 |
Onchocerca volvulus | 0.0553 | 1 | 0.5 | |
Schistosoma mansoni | tyrosine kinase | 0.0118 | 0.0048 | 0.0048 |
Leishmania major | dihydrofolate reductase-thymidylate synthase | 0.0553 | 1 | 0.5 |
Schistosoma mansoni | tyrosine kinase | 0.0118 | 0.0048 | 0.0048 |
Schistosoma mansoni | tyrosine kinase | 0.026 | 0.3288 | 0.3288 |
Echinococcus multilocularis | insulin growth factor 1 receptor beta | 0.026 | 0.3288 | 0.3256 |
Loa Loa (eye worm) | TK/INSR protein kinase | 0.026 | 0.3288 | 0.3256 |
Mycobacterium ulcerans | thymidylate synthase | 0.0553 | 1 | 0.5 |
Trichomonas vaginalis | conserved hypothetical protein | 0.0263 | 0.3365 | 0.5 |
Loa Loa (eye worm) | hypothetical protein | 0.0142 | 0.0584 | 0.0539 |
Schistosoma mansoni | bifunctional dihydrofolate reductase-thymidylate synthase | 0.0553 | 1 | 1 |
Loa Loa (eye worm) | thymidylate synthase | 0.0553 | 1 | 1 |
Echinococcus granulosus | insulin growth factor 1 receptor beta | 0.026 | 0.3288 | 0.3256 |
Plasmodium falciparum | bifunctional dihydrofolate reductase-thymidylate synthase | 0.0553 | 1 | 0.5 |
Schistosoma mansoni | tyrosine kinase | 0.0118 | 0.0048 | 0.0048 |
Brugia malayi | Protein kinase domain containing protein | 0.0144 | 0.0632 | 0.0587 |
Echinococcus granulosus | insulin receptor | 0.026 | 0.3288 | 0.3256 |
Echinococcus multilocularis | thymidylate synthase | 0.0553 | 1 | 1 |
Mycobacterium tuberculosis | Probable thymidylate synthase ThyA (ts) (TSASE) | 0.0553 | 1 | 1 |
Trypanosoma brucei | dihydrofolate reductase-thymidylate synthase | 0.0553 | 1 | 0.5 |
Echinococcus granulosus | thymidylate synthase | 0.0553 | 1 | 1 |
Mycobacterium leprae | PROBABLE THYMIDYLATE SYNTHASE THYA (TS) (TSASE) | 0.0553 | 1 | 0.5 |
Schistosoma mansoni | tyrosine kinase | 0.026 | 0.3288 | 0.3288 |
Toxoplasma gondii | bifunctional dihydrofolate reductase-thymidylate synthase | 0.0553 | 1 | 0.5 |
Brugia malayi | hypothetical protein | 0.0263 | 0.3365 | 0.3333 |
Trypanosoma cruzi | dihydrofolate reductase-thymidylate synthase | 0.0553 | 1 | 1 |
Plasmodium vivax | bifunctional dihydrofolate reductase-thymidylate synthase, putative | 0.0553 | 1 | 0.5 |
Echinococcus multilocularis | insulin receptor | 0.026 | 0.3288 | 0.3256 |
Activity type | Activity value | Assay description | Source | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|
IC50 (binding) | = 0.66 uM | Ability to bind with Endothelin B receptor competitively in the presence of (125 I) endothelin using receptor binding assay. | ChEMBL. | 11229770 |
IC50 (binding) | = 0.66 uM | Ability to bind with Endothelin B receptor competitively in the presence of (125 I) endothelin using receptor binding assay. | ChEMBL. | 11229770 |
IC50 (binding) | = 8.9 uM | Ability to bind with Endothelin A receptor competitively in the presence of (125 I) endothelin using receptor binding assay. | ChEMBL. | 11229770 |
IC50 (binding) | = 8.9 uM | Ability to bind with Endothelin A receptor competitively in the presence of (125 I) endothelin using receptor binding assay. | ChEMBL. | 11229770 |
Many chemical entities in TDR Targets come from high-throughput screenings with whole cells or tissue samples, and not all assayed compounds have been tested against a single a single target protein, probably because they get ruled out during screening process. Even if these compounds may have not been of interest in the original screening, they may come as interesting leads for other screening assays. Furthermore, we may be able to propose drug-target associations using chemical similarities and network patterns.
1 literature reference was collected for this gene.