Species | Potential target | Raw | Global | Species |
---|---|---|---|---|
Loa Loa (eye worm) | thymidylate synthase | 0.0903 | 0.6712 | 1 |
Trichomonas vaginalis | conserved hypothetical protein | 0.043 | 0.3126 | 0.5 |
Mycobacterium leprae | PROBABLE THYMIDYLATE SYNTHASE THYA (TS) (TSASE) | 0.0903 | 0.6712 | 1 |
Brugia malayi | Dihydrofolate reductase | 0.0541 | 0.3969 | 0.5914 |
Brugia malayi | latrophilin 2 splice variant baaae | 0.0036 | 0.0147 | 0.0219 |
Brugia malayi | Corticotropin releasing factor receptor 2 precursor, putative | 0.0053 | 0.0274 | 0.0408 |
Mycobacterium tuberculosis | Hypothetical protein | 0.043 | 0.3126 | 0.4658 |
Loa Loa (eye worm) | dihydrofolate reductase | 0.0541 | 0.3969 | 0.5914 |
Trypanosoma brucei | dihydrofolate reductase-thymidylate synthase | 0.1337 | 1 | 1 |
Loa Loa (eye worm) | hypothetical protein | 0.0053 | 0.0274 | 0.0408 |
Brugia malayi | Calcitonin receptor-like protein seb-1 | 0.0053 | 0.0274 | 0.0408 |
Trypanosoma cruzi | dihydrofolate reductase-thymidylate synthase, putative | 0.043 | 0.3126 | 0.3126 |
Brugia malayi | thymidylate synthase | 0.0903 | 0.6712 | 1 |
Chlamydia trachomatis | dihydrofolate reductase | 0.0541 | 0.3969 | 0.5 |
Loa Loa (eye worm) | pigment dispersing factor receptor c | 0.0053 | 0.0274 | 0.0408 |
Plasmodium vivax | bifunctional dihydrofolate reductase-thymidylate synthase, putative | 0.1337 | 1 | 1 |
Brugia malayi | hypothetical protein | 0.043 | 0.3126 | 0.4658 |
Echinococcus granulosus | dihydrofolate reductase | 0.0541 | 0.3969 | 0.5914 |
Mycobacterium ulcerans | thymidylate synthase | 0.0903 | 0.6712 | 1 |
Loa Loa (eye worm) | hypothetical protein | 0.0036 | 0.0147 | 0.0219 |
Brugia malayi | dihydrofolate reductase family protein | 0.0541 | 0.3969 | 0.5914 |
Toxoplasma gondii | bifunctional dihydrofolate reductase-thymidylate synthase | 0.1337 | 1 | 1 |
Echinococcus multilocularis | dihydrofolate reductase | 0.0541 | 0.3969 | 0.5914 |
Trypanosoma cruzi | dihydrofolate reductase-thymidylate synthase | 0.1337 | 1 | 1 |
Echinococcus multilocularis | thymidylate synthase | 0.0903 | 0.6712 | 1 |
Echinococcus granulosus | thymidylate synthase | 0.0903 | 0.6712 | 1 |
Plasmodium falciparum | bifunctional dihydrofolate reductase-thymidylate synthase | 0.1337 | 1 | 1 |
Schistosoma mansoni | bifunctional dihydrofolate reductase-thymidylate synthase | 0.0903 | 0.6712 | 1 |
Schistosoma mansoni | dihydrofolate reductase | 0.0541 | 0.3969 | 0.5914 |
Mycobacterium tuberculosis | Dihydrofolate reductase DfrA (DHFR) (tetrahydrofolate dehydrogenase) | 0.0541 | 0.3969 | 0.5914 |
Echinococcus multilocularis | atpase aaa+ type core atpase aaa type core | 0.0861 | 0.6393 | 0.9526 |
Onchocerca volvulus | 0.0903 | 0.6712 | 0.5 | |
Schistosoma mansoni | hypothetical protein | 0.0036 | 0.0147 | 0.0219 |
Mycobacterium tuberculosis | Probable thymidylate synthase ThyA (ts) (TSASE) | 0.0903 | 0.6712 | 1 |
Activity type | Activity value | Assay description | Source | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|
Delta Tm (binding) | = 24 degrees C | DNA binding measured as Changes in the DNA melting temperature of an AT-rich dodecamer (CGATTATTAAGC) (GCTTAATAATCG) upon binding of an equimolar amount of compound | ChEMBL. | 11831893 |
MIC (functional) | > 45.5 uM | In vitro antimicrobial activity against Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus | ChEMBL. | 11831893 |
MIC (functional) | > 45.5 uM | In vitro antimicrobial activity against Vancomycin resistant enterococcus strain BM4147 | ChEMBL. | 11831893 |
MIC (functional) | > 45.5 uM | In vitro antimicrobial activity against Vancomycin resistant enterococcus strain UCD-3 | ChEMBL. | 11831893 |
NCC (ADMET) | = 0 % | Toxicity assessed in human T-cells using a colorimetric cell proliferation assay. | ChEMBL. | 11831893 |
Many chemical entities in TDR Targets come from high-throughput screenings with whole cells or tissue samples, and not all assayed compounds have been tested against a single a single target protein, probably because they get ruled out during screening process. Even if these compounds may have not been of interest in the original screening, they may come as interesting leads for other screening assays. Furthermore, we may be able to propose drug-target associations using chemical similarities and network patterns.
1 literature reference was collected for this gene.