Species | Target name | Source | Bibliographic reference |
---|---|---|---|
Homo sapiens | estrogen receptor 2 (ER beta) | Starlite/ChEMBL | References |
Homo sapiens | estrogen receptor 1 | Starlite/ChEMBL | References |
Species | Potential target | Known druggable target | Length | Alignment span | Identity |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Loa Loa (eye worm) | hypothetical protein | estrogen receptor 2 (ER beta) | 495 aa | 418 aa | 25.8 % |
Species | Potential target | Raw | Global | Species |
---|---|---|---|---|
Echinococcus granulosus | fructose 16 bisphosphatase 1 | 0.0492 | 0.6801 | 0.6648 |
Echinococcus granulosus | melanoma receptor tyrosine protein kinase | 0.0342 | 0.351 | 0.32 |
Schistosoma mansoni | tyrosine kinase | 0.0637 | 1 | 1 |
Schistosoma mansoni | tyrosine kinase | 0.0339 | 0.343 | 0.3117 |
Trypanosoma cruzi | fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase, cytosolic, putative | 0.0492 | 0.6801 | 1 |
Echinococcus multilocularis | insulin receptor | 0.0204 | 0.0456 | 0.0145 |
Schistosoma mansoni | tyrosine kinase | 0.0342 | 0.351 | 0.32 |
Loa Loa (eye worm) | fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase | 0.0492 | 0.6801 | 0.6648 |
Schistosoma mansoni | tyrosine kinase | 0.0339 | 0.343 | 0.3117 |
Leishmania major | 0.0492 | 0.6801 | 0.5 | |
Schistosoma mansoni | tyrosine kinase | 0.0342 | 0.351 | 0.32 |
Schistosoma mansoni | fructose-16-bisphosphatase-related | 0.0492 | 0.6801 | 0.6648 |
Echinococcus granulosus | epidermal growth factor receptor | 0.0342 | 0.351 | 0.32 |
Toxoplasma gondii | fructose-bisphospatase II | 0.0492 | 0.6801 | 1 |
Echinococcus multilocularis | fructose 1,6 bisphosphatase 1 | 0.0492 | 0.6801 | 0.6697 |
Trypanosoma cruzi | fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase, cytosolic, putative | 0.0492 | 0.6801 | 1 |
Loa Loa (eye worm) | TK/EGFR protein kinase | 0.0637 | 1 | 1 |
Brugia malayi | fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase | 0.0492 | 0.6801 | 0.6648 |
Echinococcus multilocularis | epidermal growth factor receptor | 0.0342 | 0.351 | 0.3299 |
Echinococcus multilocularis | epidermal growth factor receptor | 0.0637 | 1 | 1 |
Echinococcus multilocularis | insulin growth factor 1 receptor beta | 0.0204 | 0.0456 | 0.0145 |
Echinococcus granulosus | epidermal growth factor receptor | 0.0637 | 1 | 1 |
Schistosoma mansoni | tyrosine kinase | 0.0339 | 0.343 | 0.3117 |
Trypanosoma brucei | fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase | 0.0492 | 0.6801 | 1 |
Activity type | Activity value | Assay description | Source | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|
IC50 (binding) | = 1.3 nM | Binding potency for human ER alpha | ChEMBL. | 15225685 |
IC50 (binding) | = 1.3 nM | Binding potency for human ER alpha | ChEMBL. | 15225685 |
IC50 (functional) | = 1.6 nM | In vitro antagonistic activity against MCF-7 cells was tested using proliferation assay | ChEMBL. | 15225685 |
IC50 (functional) | = 1.6 nM | In vitro antagonistic activity against MCF-7 cells was tested using proliferation assay | ChEMBL. | 15225685 |
IC50 (binding) | = 52 nM | Binding potency for human ER beta | ChEMBL. | 15225685 |
IC50 (binding) | = 52 nM | Binding potency for human ER beta | ChEMBL. | 15225685 |
Ratio (binding) | = 40 | Selectivity ratio for binding to ER beta and ER alpha receptors | ChEMBL. | 15225685 |
Ratio (binding) | = 40 | Selectivity ratio for binding to ER beta and ER alpha receptors | ChEMBL. | 15225685 |
Uterine activity (functional) | = 33 % | Percent antagonism of estradiol effects in rat uterine tissue at 1 mg/kg | ChEMBL. | 15225685 |
Uterine activity (functional) | = 33 % | Percent antagonism of estradiol effects in rat uterine tissue at 1 mg/kg | ChEMBL. | 15225685 |
Uterine activity (functional) | = 66 % | Percent agonism of estradiol effects in rat uterine tissue at 1 mg/kg | ChEMBL. | 15225685 |
Uterine activity (functional) | = 66 % | Percent agonism of estradiol effects in rat uterine tissue at 1 mg/kg | ChEMBL. | 15225685 |
Species name | Source | Reference | Is orphan |
---|---|---|---|
Homo sapiens | ChEMBL23 | 15225685 |
Many chemical entities in TDR Targets come from high-throughput screenings with whole cells or tissue samples, and not all assayed compounds have been tested against a single a single target protein, probably because they get ruled out during screening process. Even if these compounds may have not been of interest in the original screening, they may come as interesting leads for other screening assays. Furthermore, we may be able to propose drug-target associations using chemical similarities and network patterns.
1 literature reference was collected for this gene.