Species | Target name | Source | Bibliographic reference |
---|---|---|---|
Homo sapiens | solute carrier family 9, subfamily A (NHE1, cation proton antiporter 1), member 1 | Starlite/ChEMBL | References |
Species | Potential target | Raw | Global | Species |
---|---|---|---|---|
Entamoeba histolytica | modulator of drug activity B homolog, putative | 0.0201 | 0.1825 | 0.5 |
Loa Loa (eye worm) | hypothetical protein | 0.0066 | 0 | 0.5 |
Trichomonas vaginalis | conserved hypothetical protein | 0.0806 | 1 | 1 |
Echinococcus multilocularis | sodium:hydrogen exchanger | 0.0066 | 0 | 0.5 |
Onchocerca volvulus | Sodium\/hydrogen exchanger homolog | 0.0066 | 0 | 0.5 |
Echinococcus multilocularis | sodium:hydrogen exchanger 2 (nhe2) | 0.0066 | 0 | 0.5 |
Trichomonas vaginalis | conserved hypothetical protein | 0.0806 | 1 | 1 |
Echinococcus multilocularis | sodium:hydrogen exchanger 2 (nhe2) | 0.0066 | 0 | 0.5 |
Trichomonas vaginalis | conserved hypothetical protein | 0.0806 | 1 | 1 |
Trichomonas vaginalis | conserved hypothetical protein | 0.0806 | 1 | 1 |
Trichomonas vaginalis | conserved hypothetical protein | 0.0806 | 1 | 1 |
Echinococcus multilocularis | sodium:hydrogen exchanger | 0.0066 | 0 | 0.5 |
Trichomonas vaginalis | conserved hypothetical protein | 0.0806 | 1 | 1 |
Echinococcus granulosus | sodium:hydrogen exchanger 2 nhe2 | 0.0066 | 0 | 0.5 |
Loa Loa (eye worm) | sodium/hydrogen exchanger 3 family protein | 0.0066 | 0 | 0.5 |
Echinococcus granulosus | sodium:hydrogen exchanger 2 nhe2 | 0.0066 | 0 | 0.5 |
Trichomonas vaginalis | conserved hypothetical protein | 0.0806 | 1 | 1 |
Loa Loa (eye worm) | NHE-3 | 0.0066 | 0 | 0.5 |
Giardia lamblia | NADPH oxidoreductase, putative | 0.0806 | 1 | 1 |
Schistosoma mansoni | sodium/hydrogen exchanger 2 (nhe2) | 0.0066 | 0 | 0.5 |
Brugia malayi | sodium/hydrogen exchanger 3 family protein | 0.0066 | 0 | 0.5 |
Schistosoma mansoni | sodium/hydrogen exchanger | 0.0066 | 0 | 0.5 |
Trichomonas vaginalis | conserved hypothetical protein | 0.0605 | 0.7277 | 0.6669 |
Entamoeba histolytica | hypothetical protein | 0.0201 | 0.1825 | 0.5 |
Trichomonas vaginalis | conserved hypothetical protein | 0.0806 | 1 | 1 |
Echinococcus granulosus | sodium:hydrogen exchanger | 0.0066 | 0 | 0.5 |
Loa Loa (eye worm) | hypothetical protein | 0.0066 | 0 | 0.5 |
Trichomonas vaginalis | conserved hypothetical protein | 0.0806 | 1 | 1 |
Trichomonas vaginalis | NAD(P)H dehydrogenase, putative | 0.0806 | 1 | 1 |
Loa Loa (eye worm) | sodium/hydrogen exchanger | 0.0066 | 0 | 0.5 |
Giardia lamblia | NADPH oxidoreductase, putative | 0.0806 | 1 | 1 |
Entamoeba histolytica | iron-sulfur flavoprotein, putative | 0.0201 | 0.1825 | 0.5 |
Trichomonas vaginalis | conserved hypothetical protein | 0.0806 | 1 | 1 |
Echinococcus multilocularis | sodium:hydrogen exchanger 2 (nhe2) | 0.0066 | 0 | 0.5 |
Trichomonas vaginalis | conserved hypothetical protein | 0.0806 | 1 | 1 |
Trichomonas vaginalis | conserved hypothetical protein | 0.0806 | 1 | 1 |
Onchocerca volvulus | Sodium\/hydrogen exchanger homolog | 0.0066 | 0 | 0.5 |
Echinococcus granulosus | sodium:hydrogen exchanger 2 nhe2 | 0.0066 | 0 | 0.5 |
Onchocerca volvulus | Sodium\/hydrogen exchanger homolog | 0.0066 | 0 | 0.5 |
Echinococcus granulosus | sodium:hydrogen exchanger | 0.0066 | 0 | 0.5 |
Loa Loa (eye worm) | hypothetical protein | 0.0066 | 0 | 0.5 |
Trichomonas vaginalis | NAD(P)H dehydrogenase, putative | 0.0806 | 1 | 1 |
Trichomonas vaginalis | NAD(P)H dehydrogenase, putative | 0.0806 | 1 | 1 |
Trichomonas vaginalis | conserved hypothetical protein | 0.0806 | 1 | 1 |
Activity type | Activity value | Assay description | Source | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|
IC50 (binding) | = 9.4 uM | Inhibitory activity against Na+/H+ exchanger 1 (NHE-1) expressed in PS120 cells | ChEMBL. | 15828827 |
IC50 (binding) | = 9.4 uM | Inhibitory activity against Na+/H+ exchanger 1 (NHE-1) expressed in PS120 cells | ChEMBL. | 15828827 |
Many chemical entities in TDR Targets come from high-throughput screenings with whole cells or tissue samples, and not all assayed compounds have been tested against a single a single target protein, probably because they get ruled out during screening process. Even if these compounds may have not been of interest in the original screening, they may come as interesting leads for other screening assays. Furthermore, we may be able to propose drug-target associations using chemical similarities and network patterns.
1 literature reference was collected for this gene.