Species | Potential target | Raw | Global | Species |
---|---|---|---|---|
Leishmania major | PIF1 helicase-like protein, putative,DNA repair and recombination protein, mitochondrial precursor, putative | 0.0914 | 0.3717 | 0.3691 |
Trichomonas vaginalis | glucosylceramidase, putative | 0.025 | 0.0426 | 0.1046 |
Echinococcus granulosus | DNA polymerase alpha catalytic subunit | 0.0395 | 0.1144 | 0.3078 |
Echinococcus multilocularis | DNA polymerase alpha catalytic subunit | 0.0395 | 0.1144 | 0.3078 |
Trichomonas vaginalis | glucosylceramidase, putative | 0.0173 | 0.0044 | 0.0006 |
Trichomonas vaginalis | glucosylceramidase, putative | 0.025 | 0.0426 | 0.1046 |
Schistosoma mansoni | hypothetical protein | 0.0914 | 0.3717 | 1 |
Entamoeba histolytica | hypothetical protein, conserved | 0.0914 | 0.3717 | 0.5 |
Trypanosoma cruzi | mitochondrial DNA polymerase beta, putative | 0.2181 | 1 | 1 |
Loa Loa (eye worm) | hypothetical protein | 0.0543 | 0.1877 | 1 |
Trypanosoma cruzi | mitochondrial DNA polymerase beta, putative | 0.2181 | 1 | 1 |
Mycobacterium ulcerans | hypothetical protein | 0.1149 | 0.4883 | 0.5 |
Leishmania major | mitochondrial DNA polymerase beta-PAK, putative | 0.1032 | 0.4304 | 0.4281 |
Trypanosoma cruzi | DNA polymerase beta thumb, putative | 0.0307 | 0.0707 | 0.0669 |
Trypanosoma cruzi | DNA repair and recombination helicase protein PIF7, putative | 0.0914 | 0.3717 | 0.3691 |
Trichomonas vaginalis | conserved hypothetical protein | 0.0914 | 0.3717 | 1 |
Trypanosoma cruzi | mitochondrial DNA polymerase beta-PAK, putative | 0.0374 | 0.104 | 0.1003 |
Echinococcus multilocularis | ATP dependent DNA helicase PIF1 | 0.0914 | 0.3717 | 1 |
Trichomonas vaginalis | glucosylceramidase, putative | 0.025 | 0.0426 | 0.1046 |
Trypanosoma cruzi | DNA polymerase beta thumb, putative | 0.0307 | 0.0707 | 0.0669 |
Trichomonas vaginalis | glucosylceramidase, putative | 0.025 | 0.0426 | 0.1046 |
Echinococcus granulosus | ATP dependent DNA helicase PIF1 | 0.0914 | 0.3717 | 1 |
Trichomonas vaginalis | glucosylceramidase, putative | 0.0173 | 0.0044 | 0.0006 |
Trypanosoma cruzi | mitochondrial DNA polymerase beta-PAK, putative | 0.1032 | 0.4304 | 0.4281 |
Trichomonas vaginalis | glucosylceramidase, putative | 0.025 | 0.0426 | 0.1046 |
Trypanosoma cruzi | mitochondrial DNA polymerase beta-PAK, putative | 0.0307 | 0.0707 | 0.0669 |
Trypanosoma cruzi | DNA repair and recombination helicase protein PIF7, putative | 0.0914 | 0.3717 | 0.3691 |
Leishmania major | PIF1 helicase-like protein, putative,DNA repair and recombination protein, mitochondrial precursor, putative | 0.0914 | 0.3717 | 0.3691 |
Trypanosoma brucei | mitochondrial DNA polymerase beta | 0.2181 | 1 | 1 |
Trichomonas vaginalis | glucosylceramidase, putative | 0.025 | 0.0426 | 0.1046 |
Trypanosoma brucei | DNA repair and recombination helicase protein PIF7 | 0.0914 | 0.3717 | 0.3691 |
Brugia malayi | DNA polymerase alpha catalytic subunit | 0.032 | 0.0775 | 1 |
Giardia lamblia | Rrm3p helicase | 0.0914 | 0.3717 | 1 |
Onchocerca volvulus | DNA polymerase alpha catalytic subunit homolog | 0.0543 | 0.1877 | 0.5 |
Schistosoma mansoni | DNA polymerase alpha catalytic subunit | 0.0395 | 0.1144 | 0.3078 |
Toxoplasma gondii | hypothetical protein | 0.0352 | 0.0931 | 1 |
Entamoeba histolytica | DNA repair and recombination protein, putative | 0.0914 | 0.3717 | 0.5 |
Trypanosoma brucei | DNA repair and recombination helicase protein PIF6 | 0.0914 | 0.3717 | 0.3691 |
Trypanosoma brucei | DNA polymerase beta thumb, putative | 0.0307 | 0.0707 | 0.0669 |
Mycobacterium tuberculosis | Conserved hypothetical protein | 0.1149 | 0.4883 | 0.5 |
Trypanosoma cruzi | DNA repair and recombination helicase protein PIF6, putative | 0.0914 | 0.3717 | 0.3691 |
Plasmodium vivax | DNA polymerase alpha, putative | 0.032 | 0.0775 | 0.5 |
Trypanosoma brucei | mitochondrial DNA polymerase beta-PAK | 0.1032 | 0.4304 | 0.4281 |
Many chemical entities in TDR Targets come from high-throughput screenings with whole cells or tissue samples, and not all assayed compounds have been tested against a single a single target protein, probably because they get ruled out during screening process. Even if these compounds may have not been of interest in the original screening, they may come as interesting leads for other screening assays. Furthermore, we may be able to propose drug-target associations using chemical similarities and network patterns.
1 literature reference was collected for this gene.