Species | Potential target | Raw | Global | Species |
---|---|---|---|---|
Loa Loa (eye worm) | chitinase I | 0.0074 | 0.2004 | 0.2004 |
Brugia malayi | Endochitinase | 0.0083 | 0.3645 | 0.2052 |
Plasmodium vivax | hypothetical protein, conserved | 0.0117 | 1 | 0.5 |
Toxoplasma gondii | hypothetical protein | 0.0117 | 1 | 0.5 |
Loa Loa (eye worm) | cuticular endochitinase | 0.0074 | 0.2004 | 0.2004 |
Entamoeba histolytica | chitinase, putative | 0.0074 | 0.2004 | 0.5 |
Plasmodium falciparum | conserved protein, unknown function | 0.0117 | 1 | 0.5 |
Leishmania major | chitinase | 0.0074 | 0.2004 | 0.5 |
Onchocerca volvulus | 0.0117 | 1 | 1 | |
Loa Loa (eye worm) | hypothetical protein | 0.0117 | 1 | 1 |
Brugia malayi | endochitinase | 0.0083 | 0.3645 | 0.2052 |
Mycobacterium ulcerans | chitinase/cellulase | 0.0063 | 0 | 0.5 |
Loa Loa (eye worm) | hypothetical protein | 0.0117 | 1 | 1 |
Onchocerca volvulus | 0.0117 | 1 | 1 | |
Mycobacterium ulcerans | chitinase/cellulase | 0.0063 | 0 | 0.5 |
Onchocerca volvulus | Putative endochitinase | 0.0083 | 0.3645 | 0.2052 |
Echinococcus granulosus | Hepatocellular carcinoma associated antigen 59 | 0.0117 | 1 | 0.5 |
Schistosoma mansoni | hypothetical protein | 0.0117 | 1 | 0.5 |
Echinococcus multilocularis | Hepatocellular carcinoma associated antigen 59 | 0.0117 | 1 | 0.5 |
Mycobacterium tuberculosis | Possible chitinase | 0.0063 | 0 | 0.5 |
Onchocerca volvulus | Putative endochitinase | 0.0083 | 0.3645 | 0.2052 |
Onchocerca volvulus | Putative endochitinase | 0.0083 | 0.3645 | 0.2052 |
Loa Loa (eye worm) | microfilarial chitinase | 0.0072 | 0.1641 | 0.1641 |
Activity type | Activity value | Assay description | Source | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|
IC50 (binding) | = 184 nM | Displacement of [3H]BTX from sodium channel in rat cerebral cortex synaptosomal membrane | ChEMBL. | 17234409 |
Many chemical entities in TDR Targets come from high-throughput screenings with whole cells or tissue samples, and not all assayed compounds have been tested against a single a single target protein, probably because they get ruled out during screening process. Even if these compounds may have not been of interest in the original screening, they may come as interesting leads for other screening assays. Furthermore, we may be able to propose drug-target associations using chemical similarities and network patterns.
1 literature reference was collected for this gene.