Activity type | Activity value | Assay description | Source | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|
EC50 (functional) | = 30 uM | Compound was evaluated in vitro for its agonistic activity on isolated guinea pig ileum | ChEMBL. | 1578479 |
Emax (functional) | = 20 % | Maximum response relative to that elicited by carbachol in guinea pig ileum was determined | ChEMBL. | 1578479 |
KB (functional) | = 90 uM | Compound was evaluated in vitro for its antagonistic activity on isolated guinea pig urinary bladder | ChEMBL. | 1578479 |
Ki (binding) | = 20 uM | Compound was evaluated for its binding affinity against Muscarinic acetylcholine receptor M1 in guinea pig cerebral cortex using (-)-[3H]-QNB as radioligand | ChEMBL. | 1578479 |
Ki (binding) | = 20 uM | Compound was evaluated for its binding affinity against Muscarinic acetylcholine receptor M1 in guinea pig cerebral cortex using (-)-[3H]-QNB as radioligand | ChEMBL. | 1578479 |
Ki (binding) | > 25 uM | Compound was evaluated for its binding affinity against Muscarinic acetylcholine receptor M2 in guinea pig heart using (-)-[3H]-QNB as radioligand | ChEMBL. | 1578479 |
Ki (binding) | > 25 uM | Compound was evaluated for its binding affinity against Muscarinic acetylcholine receptor M2 in guinea pig heart using (-)-[3H]-QNB as radioligand | ChEMBL. | 1578479 |
Ki (functional) | = 57 uM | Compound was evaluated for antagonistic activity against carbachol induced contractions in isolated guinea pig urinary bladder strips | ChEMBL. | 1578479 |
Ki (binding) | = 78 uM | Compound was evaluated for its binding affinity against Muscarinic acetylcholine receptor M3 in guinea pig parotid gland using (-)-[3H]-QNB as radioligand | ChEMBL. | 1578479 |
Ki (binding) | = 78 uM | Compound was evaluated for its binding affinity against Muscarinic acetylcholine receptor M3 in guinea pig parotid gland using (-)-[3H]-QNB as radioligand | ChEMBL. | 1578479 |
Many chemical entities in TDR Targets come from high-throughput screenings with whole cells or tissue samples, and not all assayed compounds have been tested against a single a single target protein, probably because they get ruled out during screening process. Even if these compounds may have not been of interest in the original screening, they may come as interesting leads for other screening assays. Furthermore, we may be able to propose drug-target associations using chemical similarities and network patterns.
1 literature reference was collected for this gene.