Species | Target name | Source | Bibliographic reference |
---|---|---|---|
Rattus norvegicus | cAMP and cAMP-inhibited cGMP 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 10A | Starlite/ChEMBL | References |
Homo sapiens | phosphodiesterase 10A | Starlite/ChEMBL | References |
Species | Potential target | Known druggable target/s | Ortholog Group |
---|---|---|---|
Echinococcus granulosus | cAMP and cAMP inhibited cGMP 3'5' cyclic | Get druggable targets OG5_135363 | All targets in OG5_135363 |
Brugia malayi | Probable 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase C32E12.2, putative | Get druggable targets OG5_135363 | All targets in OG5_135363 |
Echinococcus multilocularis | cAMP and cAMP inhibited cGMP 3',5' cyclic | Get druggable targets OG5_135363 | All targets in OG5_135363 |
Loa Loa (eye worm) | hypothetical protein | Get druggable targets OG5_135363 | All targets in OG5_135363 |
Loa Loa (eye worm) | hypothetical protein | Get druggable targets OG5_135363 | All targets in OG5_135363 |
Species | Potential target | Raw | Global | Species |
---|---|---|---|---|
Trypanosoma cruzi | cAMP specific phosphodiesterase, putative | 0.0065 | 0 | 0.5 |
Trypanosoma brucei | cAMP-specific phosphodiesterase | 0.0065 | 0 | 0.5 |
Loa Loa (eye worm) | hypothetical protein | 0.0513 | 0.8731 | 0.9051 |
Plasmodium vivax | enoyl-acyl carrier protein reductase | 0.0541 | 0.9278 | 0.5 |
Toxoplasma gondii | enoyl-acyl carrier reductase ENR | 0.0541 | 0.9278 | 0.5 |
Mycobacterium ulcerans | enoyl-(acyl carrier protein) reductase | 0.0541 | 0.9278 | 0.5 |
Trypanosoma cruzi | cAMP specific phosphodiesterase, putative | 0.0065 | 0 | 0.5 |
Trypanosoma cruzi | cAMP specific phosphodiesterase, putative | 0.0065 | 0 | 0.5 |
Mycobacterium tuberculosis | NADH-dependent enoyl-[acyl-carrier-protein] reductase InhA (NADH-dependent enoyl-ACP reductase) | 0.0541 | 0.9278 | 0.5 |
Trichomonas vaginalis | hypothetical protein | 0.0541 | 0.9278 | 1 |
Echinococcus granulosus | cAMP and cAMP inhibited cGMP 3'5' cyclic | 0.0578 | 1 | 1 |
Plasmodium falciparum | enoyl-acyl carrier reductase | 0.0541 | 0.9278 | 0.5 |
Loa Loa (eye worm) | hypothetical protein | 0.056 | 0.9647 | 1 |
Echinococcus multilocularis | cAMP and cAMP inhibited cGMP 3',5' cyclic | 0.0578 | 1 | 1 |
Chlamydia trachomatis | enoyl-acyl-carrier protein reductase | 0.0541 | 0.9278 | 0.5 |
Trypanosoma brucei | cAMP-specific phosphodiesterase | 0.0065 | 0 | 0.5 |
Schistosoma mansoni | camp/cgmp cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase | 0.0065 | 0 | 0.5 |
Mycobacterium leprae | NADH-DEPENDENT ENOYL-[ACYL-CARRIER-PROTEIN] REDUCTASE INHA (NADH-DEPENDENT ENOYL-ACP REDUCTASE) | 0.0541 | 0.9278 | 0.5 |
Schistosoma mansoni | cgmp-dependent 35-cyclic phosphodiesterase | 0.0065 | 0 | 0.5 |
Wolbachia endosymbiont of Brugia malayi | enoyl-ACP reductase | 0.0541 | 0.9278 | 0.5 |
Activity type | Activity value | Assay description | Source | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|
IC50 (binding) | = 20.9 nM | Inhibition of human recombinant GST-tagged PDE10A using [3H]-cAMP as substrate after 30 mins by scintillation proximity assay | ChEMBL. | 24980052 |
IC50 (binding) | = 122.4 nM | Inhibition of rat recombinant GST-tagged PDE10A using [3H]-cAMP as substrate by scintillation proximity assay | ChEMBL. | 24980052 |
Inhibition (binding) | = 4.5 % | Inhibition of human recombinant PDE3A using cAMP as substrate at 1 uM after 30 mins by HTRF method | ChEMBL. | 24980052 |
Inhibition (binding) | = 7.9 % | Inhibition of human recombinant PDE4D using [3H]-cAMP as substrate at 1 uM after 30 mins by two-step radiometric assay | ChEMBL. | 24980052 |
Inhibition (binding) | = 8.2 % | Inhibition of human recombinant PDE5A using [3H]-cAMP as substrate at 1 uM after 30 mins by scintillation proximity assay | ChEMBL. | 24980052 |
Inhibition (binding) | = 16.1 % | Inhibition of human recombinant PDE2A using cAMP as substrate at 1 uM after 30 mins by HTRF method | ChEMBL. | 24980052 |
Inhibition (binding) | = 16.7 % | Inhibition of human recombinant PDE7A using [3H]-cAMP as substrate at 1 uM after 30 mins by two-step radiometric assay | ChEMBL. | 24980052 |
Inhibition (binding) | = 19 % | Inhibition of human recombinant PDE5A using [3H]-cAMP as substrate at 10 uM after 30 mins by scintillation proximity assay | ChEMBL. | 24980052 |
Inhibition (binding) | = 27.2 % | Inhibition of human recombinant PDE7A using [3H]-cAMP as substrate at 10 uM after 30 mins by two-step radiometric assay | ChEMBL. | 24980052 |
Inhibition (binding) | = 27.3 % | Inhibition of human recombinant PDE11A using [3H]-cAMP as substrate at 1 uM after 30 mins by two-step radiometric assay | ChEMBL. | 24980052 |
Inhibition (binding) | = 27.5 % | Inhibition of human recombinant PDE3A using cAMP as substrate at 10 uM after 30 mins by HTRF method | ChEMBL. | 24980052 |
Inhibition (binding) | = 34.7 % | Inhibition of human recombinant PDE4D using [3H]-cAMP as substrate at 10 uM after 30 mins by two-step radiometric assay | ChEMBL. | 24980052 |
Inhibition (binding) | = 38.5 % | Inhibition of human recombinant PDE11A using [3H]-cAMP as substrate at 10 uM after 30 mins by two-step radiometric assay | ChEMBL. | 24980052 |
Inhibition (binding) | = 40.8 % | Inhibition of human recombinant PDE2A using cAMP as substrate at 10 uM after 30 mins by HTRF method | ChEMBL. | 24980052 |
Inhibition (binding) | = 89.3 % | Inhibition of human recombinant GST-tagged PDE10A using [3H]-cAMP as substrate at 1 uM after 30 mins by scintillation proximity assay | ChEMBL. | 24980052 |
Stabilty (ADMET) | = 60.4 % | Metabolic stability in CD1 mouse liver microsomes incubated for 10 mins prior to NADPH addition measured after 60 mins by LC/MS/MS analysis | ChEMBL. | 24980052 |
Stabilty (ADMET) | = 75.4 % | Metabolic stability in human liver microsomes incubated for 10 mins prior to NADPH addition measured after 60 mins by LC/MS/MS analysis | ChEMBL. | 24980052 |
Many chemical entities in TDR Targets come from high-throughput screenings with whole cells or tissue samples, and not all assayed compounds have been tested against a single a single target protein, probably because they get ruled out during screening process. Even if these compounds may have not been of interest in the original screening, they may come as interesting leads for other screening assays. Furthermore, we may be able to propose drug-target associations using chemical similarities and network patterns.
1 literature reference was collected for this gene.