Species | Target name | Source | Bibliographic reference |
---|---|---|---|
Homo sapiens | euchromatic histone-lysine N-methyltransferase 2 | Starlite/ChEMBL | No references |
Homo sapiens | glutaminase | Starlite/ChEMBL | No references |
Species | Potential target | Raw | Global | Species |
---|---|---|---|---|
Echinococcus multilocularis | tar DNA binding protein | 0.0125 | 0.3054 | 1 |
Echinococcus granulosus | tar DNA binding protein | 0.0125 | 0.3054 | 1 |
Schistosoma mansoni | tar DNA-binding protein | 0.0125 | 0.3054 | 0.3023 |
Schistosoma mansoni | tar DNA-binding protein | 0.0125 | 0.3054 | 0.3023 |
Loa Loa (eye worm) | TAR-binding protein | 0.0125 | 0.3054 | 0.3023 |
Schistosoma mansoni | glutaminase | 0.033 | 1 | 1 |
Echinococcus granulosus | histone lysine methyltransferase setb | 0.0036 | 0.0045 | 0.0147 |
Toxoplasma gondii | histone lysine methyltransferase SET/SUV39 | 0.0036 | 0.0045 | 0.5 |
Loa Loa (eye worm) | glutaminase | 0.033 | 1 | 1 |
Brugia malayi | glutaminase DH11.1 | 0.033 | 1 | 1 |
Schistosoma mansoni | tar DNA-binding protein | 0.0125 | 0.3054 | 0.3023 |
Brugia malayi | RNA binding protein | 0.0125 | 0.3054 | 0.3023 |
Mycobacterium ulcerans | glutaminase | 0.033 | 1 | 0.5 |
Onchocerca volvulus | 0.0286 | 0.8508 | 1 | |
Loa Loa (eye worm) | RNA binding protein | 0.0125 | 0.3054 | 0.3023 |
Trichomonas vaginalis | glutaminase, putative | 0.033 | 1 | 1 |
Brugia malayi | RNA recognition motif domain containing protein | 0.0125 | 0.3054 | 0.3023 |
Loa Loa (eye worm) | pre-SET domain-containing protein family protein | 0.0251 | 0.7333 | 0.7321 |
Schistosoma mansoni | tar DNA-binding protein | 0.0125 | 0.3054 | 0.3023 |
Brugia malayi | Pre-SET motif family protein | 0.0251 | 0.7333 | 0.7321 |
Brugia malayi | TAR-binding protein | 0.0125 | 0.3054 | 0.3023 |
Plasmodium vivax | SET domain protein, putative | 0.0036 | 0.0045 | 0.5 |
Loa Loa (eye worm) | RNA recognition domain-containing protein domain-containing protein | 0.0125 | 0.3054 | 0.3023 |
Schistosoma mansoni | tar DNA-binding protein | 0.0125 | 0.3054 | 0.3023 |
Activity type | Activity value | Assay description | Source | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|
Potency (functional) | 5.6234 uM | PUBCHEM_BIOASSAY: qHTS for Inhibitors of binding or entry into cells for Lassa Virus. (Class of assay: confirmatory) [Related pubchem assays (depositor defined):AID463114, AID540249] | ChEMBL. | No reference |
Potency (functional) | 12.5893 uM | PubChem BioAssay. qHTS for Inhibitors of Glutaminase (GLS). (Class of assay: confirmatory) | ChEMBL. | No reference |
Potency (functional) | 19.9526 uM | PUBCHEM_BIOASSAY: qHTS Assay for Inhibitors of Histone Lysine Methyltransferase G9a. (Class of assay: confirmatory) [Related pubchem assays (depositor defined):AID504404] | ChEMBL. | No reference |
Potency (functional) | 22.3872 uM | PUBCHEM_BIOASSAY: qHTS Assay for Inhibitors of BAZ2B. (Class of assay: confirmatory) [Related pubchem assays (depositor defined):AID504391] | ChEMBL. | No reference |
Potency (functional) | 35.4813 uM | PUBCHEM_BIOASSAY: qHTS for Inhibitors of TGF-b: Cytotox Counterscreen. (Class of assay: confirmatory) [Related pubchem assays (depositor defined):AID588855, AID588860] | ChEMBL. | No reference |
Potency (functional) | = 39.8107 um | PUBCHEM_BIOASSAY: qHTS Assay for Promiscuous and Specific Inhibitors of Cruzain (without detergent). (Class of assay: confirmatory) [Related pubchem assays: 2158 (Confirmation qHTS Assay for Inhibitors of Cruzain), 2249 (Probe Development Summary of Promiscuous Inhibitors (Artifacts) of Cruzain), 2161 (qHTS Assay for Inhibitors of Papain: Counterscreen for Cruzain Assay), 1478 (qHTS Assay for Promiscuous and Specific Inhibitors of Cruzain (with detergent))] | ChEMBL. | No reference |
Potency (functional) | 125.8925 uM | PubChem BioAssay. qHTS of PTHR Inhibitors: Primary Screen. (Class of assay: confirmatory) | ChEMBL. | No reference |
Species name | Source | Reference | Is orphan |
---|---|---|---|
Homo sapiens | ChEMBL23 |
Many chemical entities in TDR Targets come from high-throughput screenings with whole cells or tissue samples, and not all assayed compounds have been tested against a single a single target protein, probably because they get ruled out during screening process. Even if these compounds may have not been of interest in the original screening, they may come as interesting leads for other screening assays. Furthermore, we may be able to propose drug-target associations using chemical similarities and network patterns.