Species | Target name | Source | Bibliographic reference |
---|---|---|---|
Homo sapiens | MDM2 proto-oncogene, E3 ubiquitin protein ligase | Starlite/ChEMBL | No references |
Species | Potential target | Raw | Global | Species |
---|---|---|---|---|
Echinococcus multilocularis | SWI:SNF matrix associated | 0.0013 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
Plasmodium falciparum | SWIB/MDM2 domain-containing protein | 0.0013 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
Loa Loa (eye worm) | brahma associated protein | 0.0013 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
Plasmodium vivax | SWIB/MDM2 domain-containing protein, putative | 0.0013 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
Toxoplasma gondii | DNA topoisomerase domain-containing protein | 0.0013 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
Toxoplasma gondii | SWIB/MDM2 domain-containing protein | 0.0013 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
Echinococcus multilocularis | Upstream activation factor subunit UAF30 | 0.0013 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
Schistosoma mansoni | hypothetical protein | 0.0013 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
Brugia malayi | brahma associated protein 60 kDa | 0.0013 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
Chlamydia trachomatis | SWIB complex protein | 0.0013 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
Echinococcus granulosus | Upstream activation factor subunit UAF30 | 0.0013 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
Plasmodium falciparum | SWIB/MDM2 domain-containing protein | 0.0013 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
Schistosoma mansoni | brg-1 associated factor | 0.0013 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
Trichomonas vaginalis | conserved hypothetical protein | 0.0013 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
Brugia malayi | SWIB/MDM2 domain containing protein | 0.0013 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
Chlamydia trachomatis | DNA topoisomerase I | 0.0013 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
Echinococcus granulosus | SWI:SNF matrix associated | 0.0013 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
Onchocerca volvulus | 0.0013 | 0.5 | 0.5 | |
Echinococcus multilocularis | SWI:SNF matrix associated | 0.0013 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
Schistosoma mansoni | hypothetical protein | 0.0013 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
Loa Loa (eye worm) | SWIB/MDM2 domain-containing protein | 0.0013 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
Plasmodium vivax | hypothetical protein, conserved | 0.0013 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
Schistosoma mansoni | hypothetical protein | 0.0013 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
Echinococcus multilocularis | SWI:SNF matrix associated | 0.0013 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
Activity type | Activity value | Assay description | Source | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|
IC50 (binding) | = 70.2 nM | BindingDB_Patents: Fluorescence-polarization Binding Assay. The binding affinity of the MDM2 inhibitors was determined using an optimized, sensitive and quantitative fluorescence polarization-based (FP-based) binding assay using a recombinant human His-tagged MDM2 protein (residues 1-118) and a fluorescently tagged p53-based peptide. The design of the fluorescence probe was based upon a previously reported high-affinity p53-based peptidomimetic compound (5-FAM-ßAla-ßAla-Phe-Met-Aib-pTyr-(6-Cl-LTrp)-Glu-Ac3c-Leu-Asn-NH2 (SEQ ID NO: 1)) (García-Echeverría et al., J. Med. Chem. 43: 3205-3208 (2000)). This tagged peptide is called PMDM6-F. MDM2 protein was serially double diluted in a Dynex 96-well, black, round-bottom plate, and the PMDM6-F peptide was added at 1 nM concentration. The assay was performed in the buffer: 100 mM potassium phosphate, pH 7.5; 100 µg/mL bovine gamma globulin; 0.02% sodium azide, 0.01% Triton X-100) and the polarization values were measured after 3 h of incubation using an ULTRA READER (Tecan U.S. Inc). | ChEMBL. | No reference |
IC50 (binding) | = 137.94 nM | BindingDB_Patents: Fluorescence-polarization Binding Assay. The binding affinity of the MDM2 inhibitors was optionally determined using a fluorescence polarization-based (FP-based) binding assay using a recombinant human MDM2 protein (residues 5-109) and PMDM6-F as follows: MDM2 protein was serially diluted with a step of 1.8 in a Costar 96-well, black, non binding surface reference 3686 plate, and the PMDM6-F peptide was added at 5 nM concentration. The assay was performed in the buffer: 100 mM potassium phosphate, pH 7.5; 100 µg/mL bovine gamma globulin, 0.01% Triton X-100) and the anisotropy values were measured at equilibrium using a Fusion reader (Packard). | ChEMBL. | No reference |
IC50 (binding) | = 157.86 nM | BindingDB_Patents: Fluorescence-polarization Binding Assay. The binding affinity of the MDM2 inhibitors was optionally determined using a fluorescence polarization-based (FP-based) binding assay using a recombinant human MDM2 protein (residues 5-109) and PMDM6-F as follows: MDM2 protein was serially diluted with a step of 1.8 in a Costar 96-well, black, non binding surface reference 3686 plate, and the PMDM6-F peptide was added at 5 nM concentration. The assay was performed in the buffer: 100 mM potassium phosphate, pH 7.5; 100 µg/mL bovine gamma globulin, 0.01% Triton X-100) and the anisotropy values were measured at equilibrium using a Fusion reader (Packard). | ChEMBL. | No reference |
IC50 (binding) | < 500 nM | BindingDB_Patents: Fluorescence-Polarization Binding Assay. The binding affinity of the MDM2 inhibitors was determined using an optimized, sensitive and quantitative fluorescence polarization-based (FP-based) binding assay using a recombinant human His-tagged MDM2 protein (residues 1-118) and a fluorescently tagged p53-based peptide.The design of the fluorescence probe was based upon a previously reported high-affinity p53-based peptidomimetic compound (5-FAM-beta Ala-beta Ala-Phe-Met-Aib-pTyr-(6-Cl-LTrp)-Glu-Ac3c-Leu-Asn-NH2 (SEQ ID NO: 1)) Garcia-Echeverria et al., J. Med. Chem. 43: 3205-3208 (2000)). This tagged peptide is called PMDM6-F. The Kd value of PMDM6-F with the recombinant MDM2 protein was determined from the saturation curve. MDM2 protein was serially double diluted in a Dynex 96-well, black, round-bottom plate, and the PMDM6-F peptide was added at 1 nM concentration. The assay was performed in the buffer: 100 mM potassium phosphate, pH 7.5; 100 ug/mL bovine gamma globulin; 0.02% sodium azide, 0.01% Triton X-100). | ChEMBL. | No reference |
Many chemical entities in TDR Targets come from high-throughput screenings with whole cells or tissue samples, and not all assayed compounds have been tested against a single a single target protein, probably because they get ruled out during screening process. Even if these compounds may have not been of interest in the original screening, they may come as interesting leads for other screening assays. Furthermore, we may be able to propose drug-target associations using chemical similarities and network patterns.