Species | Target name | Source | Bibliographic reference |
---|---|---|---|
Homo sapiens | cytidine deaminase | No references |
Species | Potential target | Raw | Global | Species |
---|---|---|---|---|
Onchocerca volvulus | 0.0065 | 0.5 | 0.5 | |
Giardia lamblia | Cytidine deaminase | 0.0065 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
Mycobacterium leprae | PROBABLE CYTIDINE DEAMINASE CDD (CYTIDINE AMINOHYDROLASE) (CYTIDINE NUCLEOSIDE DEAMINASE) | 0.0065 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
Trypanosoma cruzi | cytidine deaminase-like protein, putative | 0.0065 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
Mycobacterium tuberculosis | Probable cytidine deaminase Cdd (cytidine aminohydrolase) (cytidine nucleoside deaminase) | 0.0065 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
Onchocerca volvulus | 0.0065 | 0.5 | 0.5 | |
Echinococcus multilocularis | cytidine deaminase | 0.0065 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
Trypanosoma cruzi | cytidine deaminase-like protein | 0.0065 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
Mycobacterium ulcerans | cytidine deaminase | 0.0065 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
Entamoeba histolytica | cytidine deaminase, putative | 0.0065 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
Toxoplasma gondii | cytidine and deoxycytidylate deaminase zinc-binding region domain-containing protein | 0.0065 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
Trypanosoma brucei | cytidine deaminase | 0.0065 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
Trichomonas vaginalis | cytidine deaminase, putative | 0.0065 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
Leishmania major | cytidine deaminase-like protein | 0.0065 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
Echinococcus granulosus | cytidine deaminase | 0.0065 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
Trichomonas vaginalis | cytidine deaminase, putative | 0.0065 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
Activity type | Activity value | Assay description | Source | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|
IC50 (binding) | = 237 nM | BindingDB_Patents: Enzymatic Assay. The cytidine deaminase (CDA) enzymatic assay described by Cacciamani, T. et al., Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1991, 290, 285-92; Cohen R. et al., J. Biol. Chem., 1971, 246, 7566-8; and Vincenzetti S. et al., Protein Expr. Purif. 1996, 8, 247-53 was used to determine the inhibitory activity (IC50) of compounds described herein. Using this assay, the IC50 of these compounds was determined by following the decrease of substrate (cytidine) caused by the deamination reaction catalyzed by CDA. Disappearance of substrate (cytidine) over time was monitored by the absorbance at 280 nm of the reaction. The assay reaction was carried out in potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4, 20 mM, containing 1 mM DTT) in a total volume of 100 ul in a 96-well plate format. The final reaction mixture contained cytidine (50 uM) and purified human recombinant CDA. Purified enzyme was diluted so as to produce an absorbance change of approximately 2 milli-absorbance units/minute. | ChEMBL. | No reference |
IC50 (binding) | = 237 nM | BindingDB_Patents: Enzymatic Assay. The cytidine deaminase (CDA) enzymatic assay described by Cacciamani, T. et al., Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1991, 290, 285-92; Cohen R. et al., J. Biol. Chem., 1971, 246, 7566-8; and Vincenzetti S. et al., Protein Expr. Purif. 1996, 8, 247-53 was used to determine the inhibitory activity (IC50) of compounds described herein. Using this assay, the IC50 of these compounds was determined by following the decrease of substrate (cytidine) caused by the deamination reaction catalyzed by CDA. Disappearance of substrate (cytidine) over time was monitored by the absorbance at 280 nm of the reaction. The assay reaction was carried out in potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4, 20 mM, containing 1 mM DTT) in a total volume of 100 ul in a 96-well plate format. The final reaction mixture contained cytidine (50 uM) and purified human recombinant CDA. Purified enzyme was diluted so as to produce an absorbance change of approximately 2 milli-absorbance units/minute. | ChEMBL. | No reference |
Many chemical entities in TDR Targets come from high-throughput screenings with whole cells or tissue samples, and not all assayed compounds have been tested against a single a single target protein, probably because they get ruled out during screening process. Even if these compounds may have not been of interest in the original screening, they may come as interesting leads for other screening assays. Furthermore, we may be able to propose drug-target associations using chemical similarities and network patterns.