Species | Potential target | Raw | Global | Species |
---|---|---|---|---|
Echinococcus multilocularis | Ankyrin | 0.0065 | 0.0006 | 0.0021 |
Echinococcus granulosus | nuclear factor of activated T cells 5 | 0.0329 | 0.2904 | 1 |
Loa Loa (eye worm) | hypothetical protein | 0.0977 | 1 | 1 |
Echinococcus multilocularis | nuclear factor of activated T cells 5 | 0.0329 | 0.2904 | 1 |
Echinococcus granulosus | Ankyrin | 0.0065 | 0.0006 | 0.0021 |
Schistosoma mansoni | retinoblastoma-binding protein 4 (rbbp4) | 0.0065 | 0.0006 | 1 |
Onchocerca volvulus | 0.0977 | 1 | 0.5 |
Activity type | Activity value | Assay description | Source | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|
Activity (binding) | = 98.12 % | Percent kynurenine 3-hydroxylase activity determined by the conversion of L-kynurenine to 3-hydroxykynurenine in rat striatum at 1 mM concentration of compound (value is mean +/- SEM) | ChEMBL. | 15509163 |
Activity (binding) | = 98.1200000000001 % | Percent kynurenine 3-hydroxylase activity determined by the conversion of L-kynurenine to 3-hydroxykynurenine in rat striatum at 1 mM concentration of compound (value is mean +/- SEM) | ChEMBL. | 15509163 |
Inhibition (binding) | = 18.89 % | Inhibition of recombinant iNOS (unknown origin) assessed as conversion of L-[3H]-arginine to L-[3H]-citrulline at 1 mM after 30 mins | ChEMBL. | 23735830 |
Inhibition (binding) | = 70.24 % | Percent inhibition towards rat striatal neuronal nitric oxide synthase (nNOs) at 1 mM concentration (value is mean +/- SEM) | ChEMBL. | 15509163 |
Inhibition (binding) | = 70.24 % | Percent inhibition towards rat striatal neuronal nitric oxide synthase (nNOs) at 1 mM concentration (value is mean +/- SEM) | ChEMBL. | 15509163 |
Inhibition (binding) | = 70.24 % | Inhibition of recombinant nNOS (unknown origin) assessed as conversion of L-[3H]-arginine to L-[3H]-citrulline at 1 mM after 30 mins | ChEMBL. | 23735830 |
Many chemical entities in TDR Targets come from high-throughput screenings with whole cells or tissue samples, and not all assayed compounds have been tested against a single a single target protein, probably because they get ruled out during screening process. Even if these compounds may have not been of interest in the original screening, they may come as interesting leads for other screening assays. Furthermore, we may be able to propose drug-target associations using chemical similarities and network patterns.
2 literature references were collected for this gene.