Species | Potential target | Raw | Global | Species |
---|---|---|---|---|
Loa Loa (eye worm) | hypothetical protein | 0.168 | 0.6164 | 0.5592 |
Onchocerca volvulus | 0.168 | 0.6164 | 0.2534 | |
Echinococcus multilocularis | tissue type plasminogen activator | 0.2234 | 1 | 0.5 |
Schistosoma mansoni | hypothetical protein | 0.2234 | 1 | 1 |
Echinococcus granulosus | tissue type plasminogen activator | 0.2234 | 1 | 0.5 |
Plasmodium falciparum | cysteine repeat modular protein 1 | 0.2234 | 1 | 0.5 |
Onchocerca volvulus | 0.2234 | 1 | 1 | |
Toxoplasma gondii | kringle domain-containing protein | 0.2234 | 1 | 0.5 |
Brugia malayi | Muscle positioning protein 4 | 0.168 | 0.6164 | 0.2534 |
Loa Loa (eye worm) | TK/ROR protein kinase | 0.2234 | 1 | 1 |
Loa Loa (eye worm) | hypothetical protein | 0.2234 | 1 | 1 |
Loa Loa (eye worm) | DOMON domain-containing protein | 0.1492 | 0.4862 | 0.4097 |
Leishmania major | hypothetical protein, conserved | 0.2234 | 1 | 0.5 |
Plasmodium vivax | cysteine repeat modular protein 1, putative | 0.2234 | 1 | 0.5 |
Trypanosoma cruzi | hypothetical protein, conserved | 0.2234 | 1 | 0.5 |
Loa Loa (eye worm) | hypothetical protein | 0.1492 | 0.4862 | 0.4097 |
Brugia malayi | Kringle domain containing protein | 0.2234 | 1 | 1 |
Schistosoma mansoni | hypothetical protein | 0.1492 | 0.4862 | 0.4862 |
Schistosoma mansoni | subfamily S1A unassigned peptidase (S01 family) | 0.1061 | 0.1881 | 0.1881 |
Activity type | Activity value | Assay description | Source | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|
CC50 (ADMET) | = 49.39 uM | Cytotoxicity against MT4 cells after 4 days by MTT method | ChEMBL. | 17381078 |
CC50 (ADMET) | = 49.39 uM | Cytotoxicity against MT4 cells after 4 days by MTT method | ChEMBL. | 17381078 |
IC50 (functional) | = 0.8 uM | Antiviral activity against wild type HIV1 3B in MT4 cells after 4 days by MTT method | ChEMBL. | 17381078 |
Ratio CC50/IC50 (functional) | = 61 | Selectivity index, CC50 for MT4 cells/IC50 for HIV1 3B | ChEMBL. | 17381078 |
Many chemical entities in TDR Targets come from high-throughput screenings with whole cells or tissue samples, and not all assayed compounds have been tested against a single a single target protein, probably because they get ruled out during screening process. Even if these compounds may have not been of interest in the original screening, they may come as interesting leads for other screening assays. Furthermore, we may be able to propose drug-target associations using chemical similarities and network patterns.
1 literature reference was collected for this gene.