Species | Potential target | Raw | Global | Species |
---|---|---|---|---|
Echinococcus multilocularis | expressed protein | 0.039 | 1 | 1 |
Trichomonas vaginalis | conserved hypothetical protein | 0.002 | 0 | 0.5 |
Trichomonas vaginalis | conserved hypothetical protein | 0.002 | 0 | 0.5 |
Schistosoma mansoni | dihydropyridine-sensitive l-type calcium channel | 0.0078 | 0.1568 | 0.4304 |
Trichomonas vaginalis | conserved hypothetical protein | 0.002 | 0 | 0.5 |
Loa Loa (eye worm) | hypothetical protein | 0.0071 | 0.139 | 1 |
Trichomonas vaginalis | conserved hypothetical protein | 0.002 | 0 | 0.5 |
Brugia malayi | Cache domain containing protein | 0.0071 | 0.139 | 1 |
Schistosoma mansoni | dihydropyridine-sensitive l-type calcium channel | 0.0155 | 0.3643 | 1 |
Echinococcus multilocularis | voltage dependent calcium channel subunit | 0.0355 | 0.9052 | 0.9052 |
Entamoeba histolytica | hypothetical protein | 0.002 | 0 | 0.5 |
Echinococcus multilocularis | voltage dependent calcium channel subunit | 0.0161 | 0.3822 | 0.3822 |
Echinococcus granulosus | voltage dependent calcium channel subunit | 0.0161 | 0.3822 | 0.3822 |
Trichomonas vaginalis | regulator of G protein signaling 5, rgs5, putative | 0.002 | 0 | 0.5 |
Schistosoma mansoni | serine-rich repeat protein | 0.0083 | 0.1712 | 0.4699 |
Schistosoma mansoni | hypothetical protein | 0.0083 | 0.1712 | 0.4699 |
Trichomonas vaginalis | conserved hypothetical protein | 0.002 | 0 | 0.5 |
Entamoeba histolytica | hypothetical protein | 0.002 | 0 | 0.5 |
Entamoeba histolytica | hypothetical protein | 0.002 | 0 | 0.5 |
Trichomonas vaginalis | conserved hypothetical protein | 0.002 | 0 | 0.5 |
Echinococcus granulosus | voltage dependent calcium channel subunit | 0.0355 | 0.9052 | 0.9052 |
Many chemical entities in TDR Targets come from high-throughput screenings with whole cells or tissue samples, and not all assayed compounds have been tested against a single a single target protein, probably because they get ruled out during screening process. Even if these compounds may have not been of interest in the original screening, they may come as interesting leads for other screening assays. Furthermore, we may be able to propose drug-target associations using chemical similarities and network patterns.
1 literature reference was collected for this gene.