Species | Target name | Source | Bibliographic reference |
---|---|---|---|
Homo sapiens | thromboxane A2 receptor | Starlite/ChEMBL | No references |
Activity type | Activity value | Assay description | Source | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|
CF (binding) | = 1.5 | TP receptor affinity, expressed as competition factor (CF) which is the ratio of IC50 of test to IC50 of standard | ChEMBL. | No reference |
CF (binding) | = 1.5 | TP receptor affinity, expressed as competition factor (CF) which is the ratio of IC50 of test to IC50 of standard | ChEMBL. | No reference |
CF (binding) | = 20 | TP receptor affinity, expressed as competition factor (CF) which is the ratio of IC50 of test to IC50 of standard | ChEMBL. | No reference |
IC50 (functional) | = 0.0000001 M | Ability to inhibit blood platelet aggregation of human platelet-rich plasma induced by TP-receptor agonist U 46619 | ChEMBL. | No reference |
IC50 (functional) | = 0.0000001 M | Ability to inhibit blood platelet aggregation of human platelet-rich plasma induced by TP-receptor agonist U 46619 | ChEMBL. | No reference |
IC50 (functional) | = 0.0000017 M | Ability to inhibit blood platelet aggregation of human platelet-rich plasma induced by TP-receptor agonist U 46619 | ChEMBL. | No reference |
Relative potency (functional) | = 0.17 | Antiaggregatory potency of the compound relative to TP-receptor antagonist SQ 29548 | ChEMBL. | No reference |
Relative potency (functional) | = 0.005 | Antiaggregatory potency of the compound relative to TP-receptor antagonist SQ 29548 | ChEMBL. | No reference |
Relative potency (functional) | = 0.17 | Antiaggregatory potency of the compound relative to TP-receptor antagonist SQ 29548 | ChEMBL. | No reference |
Many chemical entities in TDR Targets come from high-throughput screenings with whole cells or tissue samples, and not all assayed compounds have been tested against a single a single target protein, probably because they get ruled out during screening process. Even if these compounds may have not been of interest in the original screening, they may come as interesting leads for other screening assays. Furthermore, we may be able to propose drug-target associations using chemical similarities and network patterns.