Species | Target name | Source | Bibliographic reference |
---|---|---|---|
Homo sapiens | polymerase (DNA directed), eta | Starlite/ChEMBL | No references |
Homo sapiens | nuclear factor, erythroid 2-like 2 | Starlite/ChEMBL | No references |
Species | Potential target | Raw | Global | Species |
---|---|---|---|---|
Entamoeba histolytica | hypothetical protein | 0.0043 | 0.6547 | 1 |
Entamoeba histolytica | hypothetical protein | 0.0043 | 0.6547 | 1 |
Brugia malayi | hypothetical protein | 0.0043 | 0.6547 | 0.6547 |
Entamoeba histolytica | hypothetical protein | 0.0043 | 0.6547 | 1 |
Schistosoma mansoni | hypothetical protein | 0.0043 | 0.6547 | 0.6547 |
Schistosoma mansoni | transcription factor LCR-F1 | 0.0043 | 0.6547 | 0.6547 |
Leishmania major | DNA polymerase eta, putative | 0.0054 | 1 | 1 |
Entamoeba histolytica | hypothetical protein | 0.0043 | 0.6547 | 1 |
Echinococcus granulosus | dna polymerase eta | 0.0054 | 1 | 1 |
Trypanosoma cruzi | DNA polymerase eta, putative | 0.0054 | 1 | 1 |
Trypanosoma cruzi | DNA polymerase eta, putative | 0.0038 | 0.4775 | 0.4775 |
Mycobacterium tuberculosis | Conserved hypothetical protein | 0.0023 | 0 | 0.5 |
Leishmania major | DNA polymerase eta, putative | 0.0038 | 0.4775 | 0.4775 |
Loa Loa (eye worm) | hypothetical protein | 0.0054 | 1 | 1 |
Toxoplasma gondii | ImpB/MucB/SamB family protein | 0.0038 | 0.4775 | 0.5 |
Mycobacterium ulcerans | DNA polymerase IV | 0.0023 | 0 | 0.5 |
Echinococcus multilocularis | dna polymerase eta | 0.0054 | 1 | 1 |
Trichomonas vaginalis | DNA polymerase eta, putative | 0.0023 | 0 | 0.5 |
Giardia lamblia | DINP protein human, muc B family | 0.0023 | 0 | 0.5 |
Schistosoma mansoni | DNA polymerase eta | 0.0054 | 1 | 1 |
Echinococcus multilocularis | Basic leucine zipper (bZIP) transcription | 0.0043 | 0.6547 | 0.6547 |
Trichomonas vaginalis | DNA polymerase IV / kappa, putative | 0.0023 | 0 | 0.5 |
Echinococcus granulosus | Basic leucine zipper bZIP transcription | 0.0043 | 0.6547 | 0.6547 |
Trypanosoma brucei | DNA polymerase eta, putative | 0.0054 | 1 | 1 |
Mycobacterium tuberculosis | Possible DNA-damage-inducible protein P DinP (DNA polymerase V) (pol IV 2) (DNA nucleotidyltransferase (DNA-directed)) | 0.0023 | 0 | 0.5 |
Mycobacterium ulcerans | DNA polymerase IV | 0.0023 | 0 | 0.5 |
Activity type | Activity value | Assay description | Source | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|
Potency (functional) | 0.6513 uM | PUBCHEM_BIOASSAY: Nrf2 qHTS screen for inhibitors. (Class of assay: confirmatory) [Related pubchem assays (depositor defined):AID493153, AID493163, AID504648] | ChEMBL. | No reference |
Potency (functional) | 1.3115 uM | PUBCHEM_BIOASSAY: Primary qHTS for delayed death inhibitors of the malarial parasite plastid, 96 hour incubation. (Class of assay: confirmatory) [Related pubchem assays (depositor defined):AID488745, AID488752, AID488774, AID504848, AID504850] | ChEMBL. | No reference |
Potency (functional) | 2.8184 uM | PUBCHEM_BIOASSAY: qHTS for Inhibitors of Polymerase Eta. (Class of assay: confirmatory) [Related pubchem assays (depositor defined):AID588636] | ChEMBL. | No reference |
Potency (functional) | 89.1251 uM | PUBCHEM_BIOASSAY: qHTS for Inhibitors of Polymerase Kappa. (Class of assay: confirmatory) [Related pubchem assays (depositor defined):AID588638] | ChEMBL. | No reference |
Potency (functional) | 100 uM | PUBCHEM_BIOASSAY: qHTS for Inhibitors of Polymerase Iota. (Class of assay: confirmatory) [Related pubchem assays (depositor defined):AID588623] | ChEMBL. | No reference |
Potency (functional) | 100 uM | PubChem BioAssay. qHTS for Inhibitors of WRN Helicase. (Class of assay: confirmatory) | ChEMBL. | No reference |
Species name | Source | Reference | Is orphan |
---|---|---|---|
Plasmodium falciparum | ChEMBL23 |
Many chemical entities in TDR Targets come from high-throughput screenings with whole cells or tissue samples, and not all assayed compounds have been tested against a single a single target protein, probably because they get ruled out during screening process. Even if these compounds may have not been of interest in the original screening, they may come as interesting leads for other screening assays. Furthermore, we may be able to propose drug-target associations using chemical similarities and network patterns.