Species | Target name | Source | Bibliographic reference |
---|---|---|---|
Homo sapiens | replication protein A1, 70kDa | Starlite/ChEMBL | References |
Species | Potential target | Raw | Global | Species |
---|---|---|---|---|
Schistosoma mansoni | plexin | 0.0092 | 0.4615 | 0.4885 |
Brugia malayi | Sema domain containing protein | 0.0066 | 0.3142 | 0.2348 |
Onchocerca volvulus | 0.0066 | 0.3142 | 0.2346 | |
Trichomonas vaginalis | Clan MA, family M8, leishmanolysin-like metallopeptidase | 0.0029 | 0.1038 | 0.3936 |
Trichomonas vaginalis | conserved hypothetical protein | 0.0029 | 0.1038 | 0.3936 |
Loa Loa (eye worm) | hypothetical protein | 0.0158 | 0.8359 | 0.8169 |
Echinococcus multilocularis | hypothetical protein | 0.0066 | 0.3142 | 0.2348 |
Schistosoma mansoni | replication factor A 1 rfa1 | 0.0042 | 0.1795 | 0.1034 |
Loa Loa (eye worm) | hypothetical protein | 0.0092 | 0.4615 | 0.3991 |
Entamoeba histolytica | hypothetical protein | 0.0029 | 0.1038 | 0.5816 |
Schistosoma mansoni | hypothetical protein | 0.0066 | 0.3142 | 0.2874 |
Echinococcus granulosus | plexin a4 | 0.0187 | 1 | 1 |
Plasmodium falciparum | replication protein A1, large subunit | 0.002 | 0.0547 | 0.5 |
Trichomonas vaginalis | Clan MA, family M8, leishmanolysin-like metallopeptidase | 0.0029 | 0.1038 | 0.3936 |
Loa Loa (eye worm) | hypothetical protein | 0.0066 | 0.3142 | 0.2348 |
Trichomonas vaginalis | Clan MA, family M8, leishmanolysin-like metallopeptidase | 0.0029 | 0.1038 | 0.3936 |
Echinococcus multilocularis | plexin a4 | 0.0187 | 1 | 1 |
Plasmodium vivax | replication protein A1, large subunit, putative | 0.002 | 0.0547 | 0.5 |
Trichomonas vaginalis | replication factor A 1, rfa1, putative | 0.004 | 0.1677 | 0.9053 |
Leishmania major | replication factor A, 51kDa subunit, putative | 0.002 | 0.0547 | 0.5 |
Trichomonas vaginalis | conserved hypothetical protein | 0.0029 | 0.1038 | 0.3936 |
Loa Loa (eye worm) | hypothetical protein | 0.0066 | 0.3142 | 0.2348 |
Trypanosoma cruzi | Replication factor A protein 1 | 0.002 | 0.0547 | 0.5 |
Brugia malayi | hypothetical protein | 0.0066 | 0.3142 | 0.2348 |
Loa Loa (eye worm) | sema domain-containing protein | 0.0066 | 0.3142 | 0.2348 |
Trichomonas vaginalis | replication factor A 1, rfa1, putative | 0.0042 | 0.1795 | 1 |
Schistosoma mansoni | hypothetical protein | 0.0066 | 0.3142 | 0.2874 |
Schistosoma mansoni | semaphorin 5-related | 0.0066 | 0.3142 | 0.2874 |
Schistosoma mansoni | plexin | 0.0158 | 0.8359 | 1 |
Entamoeba histolytica | hypothetical protein | 0.0029 | 0.1038 | 0.5816 |
Loa Loa (eye worm) | hypothetical protein | 0.0066 | 0.3142 | 0.2348 |
Brugia malayi | replication factor A 73 kDa subunit | 0.0042 | 0.1795 | 0.0845 |
Loa Loa (eye worm) | hypothetical protein | 0.0066 | 0.3142 | 0.2348 |
Brugia malayi | Plexin repeat family protein | 0.0158 | 0.8359 | 0.8169 |
Trichomonas vaginalis | conserved hypothetical protein | 0.0029 | 0.1038 | 0.3936 |
Brugia malayi | hypothetical protein | 0.0066 | 0.3142 | 0.2348 |
Schistosoma mansoni | hypothetical protein | 0.0092 | 0.4615 | 0.4885 |
Brugia malayi | Sema domain containing protein | 0.0066 | 0.3142 | 0.2348 |
Loa Loa (eye worm) | sema domain-containing protein | 0.0066 | 0.3142 | 0.2348 |
Trichomonas vaginalis | replication factor A 1, rfa1, putative | 0.0042 | 0.1795 | 1 |
Echinococcus granulosus | semaphorin 1A | 0.0066 | 0.3142 | 0.2348 |
Trichomonas vaginalis | conserved hypothetical protein | 0.0029 | 0.1038 | 0.3936 |
Echinococcus granulosus | semaphorin 5B | 0.0066 | 0.3142 | 0.2348 |
Loa Loa (eye worm) | plexin A | 0.0187 | 1 | 1 |
Echinococcus multilocularis | semaphorin 5B | 0.0066 | 0.3142 | 0.2348 |
Trichomonas vaginalis | Clan MA, family M8, leishmanolysin-like metallopeptidase | 0.0029 | 0.1038 | 0.3936 |
Entamoeba histolytica | hypothetical protein | 0.0029 | 0.1038 | 0.5816 |
Trichomonas vaginalis | conserved hypothetical protein | 0.0029 | 0.1038 | 0.3936 |
Trypanosoma brucei | Replication factor A protein 1 | 0.002 | 0.0547 | 0.5 |
Trichomonas vaginalis | Clan MA, family M8, leishmanolysin-like metallopeptidase | 0.0029 | 0.1038 | 0.3936 |
Entamoeba histolytica | hypothetical protein | 0.0029 | 0.1038 | 0.5816 |
Loa Loa (eye worm) | hypothetical protein | 0.0066 | 0.3142 | 0.2348 |
Entamoeba histolytica | protein kinase domain containing protein | 0.0037 | 0.1477 | 1 |
Echinococcus multilocularis | replication protein A 70 kDa DNA binding | 0.0042 | 0.1795 | 0.0845 |
Onchocerca volvulus | 0.0158 | 0.8359 | 1 | |
Entamoeba histolytica | cell surface protease gp63, putative | 0.0029 | 0.1038 | 0.5816 |
Trichomonas vaginalis | conserved hypothetical protein | 0.0029 | 0.1038 | 0.3936 |
Trichomonas vaginalis | conserved hypothetical protein | 0.0029 | 0.1038 | 0.3936 |
Echinococcus granulosus | replication protein A 70 kDa DNA binding | 0.0042 | 0.1795 | 0.0845 |
Toxoplasma gondii | replication factor-a protein 1 (rpa1) subfamily protein | 0.002 | 0.0547 | 1 |
Entamoeba histolytica | tyrosin kinase, putative | 0.0037 | 0.1477 | 1 |
Loa Loa (eye worm) | hypothetical protein | 0.0066 | 0.3142 | 0.2348 |
Loa Loa (eye worm) | replication factor A 73 kDa subunit | 0.0042 | 0.1795 | 0.0845 |
Activity type | Activity value | Assay description | Source | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kd (binding) | > 500 nM | Binding affinity to RPA70N protein (unknown origin) incubated for 1 hr using FITC-ATRIP/FITC-ATRIP2 peptide probe by fluorescence polarization anisotropy assay | ChEMBL. | 25699140 |
Kd (binding) | = 580 nM | Binding affinity to RPA70N protein (unknown origin) by HSQC NMR-based titration method | ChEMBL. | 25699140 |
Kd (binding) | = 580 uM | Binding affinity to RPA70N (1 to 120) site1 (unknown origin) expressed in Escherichia coli BL21-DE3 cells by NMR spectroscopy | ChEMBL. | 24147804 |
Kd (binding) | > 2000 uM | Binding affinity to RPA70N (1 to 120) site2 (unknown origin) expressed in Escherichia coli BL21-DE3 cells by NMR spectroscopy | ChEMBL. | 24147804 |
Many chemical entities in TDR Targets come from high-throughput screenings with whole cells or tissue samples, and not all assayed compounds have been tested against a single a single target protein, probably because they get ruled out during screening process. Even if these compounds may have not been of interest in the original screening, they may come as interesting leads for other screening assays. Furthermore, we may be able to propose drug-target associations using chemical similarities and network patterns.
2 literature references were collected for this gene.