Species | Target name | Source | Bibliographic reference |
---|---|---|---|
Rattus norvegicus | Glutamate NMDA receptor; Grin1/Grin2c | Starlite/ChEMBL | References |
Species | Potential target | Known druggable target | Length | Alignment span | Identity |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Echinococcus multilocularis | glutamate (NMDA) receptor subunit | Glutamate NMDA receptor; Grin1/Grin2c | 938 aa | 822 aa | 23.2 % |
Schistosoma mansoni | glutamate receptor NMDA | Glutamate NMDA receptor; Grin1/Grin2c | 938 aa | 933 aa | 39.1 % |
Drosophila melanogaster | Glutamate receptor IA | Glutamate NMDA receptor; Grin1/Grin2c | 938 aa | 979 aa | 23.7 % |
Drosophila melanogaster | NMDA receptor 2 | Glutamate NMDA receptor; Grin1/Grin2c | 938 aa | 878 aa | 27.4 % |
Species | Potential target | Raw | Global | Species |
---|---|---|---|---|
Trichomonas vaginalis | voltage and ligand gated potassium channel, putative | 0.0038 | 0.1224 | 0.5 |
Mycobacterium tuberculosis | Probable glutamine-binding lipoprotein GlnH (GLNBP) | 0.0023 | 0.0524 | 0.5 |
Loa Loa (eye worm) | kinesin-like protein KLP2 | 0.0029 | 0.082 | 0.6083 |
Plasmodium vivax | kinesin-5 | 0.0029 | 0.082 | 0.5 |
Echinococcus granulosus | glutamate receptor 2 | 0.0014 | 0.0084 | 0.0084 |
Echinococcus multilocularis | Glutamate receptor, ionotropic kainate 3 | 0.0032 | 0.0943 | 0.0943 |
Echinococcus granulosus | Glutamate receptor ionotropic kainate 2 | 0.0014 | 0.0084 | 0.0084 |
Echinococcus multilocularis | Glutamate receptor, ionotropic kainate 2 | 0.0014 | 0.0084 | 0.0084 |
Loa Loa (eye worm) | voltage and ligand gated potassium channel | 0.0041 | 0.1349 | 1 |
Chlamydia trachomatis | glutamine binding protein | 0.0023 | 0.0524 | 0.5 |
Entamoeba histolytica | kinesin, putative | 0.0029 | 0.082 | 0.5 |
Echinococcus multilocularis | Glutamate receptor, ionotropic kainate 2 | 0.0014 | 0.0084 | 0.0084 |
Treponema pallidum | amino acid ABC transporter, periplasmic binding protein (hisJ) | 0.0023 | 0.0524 | 0.5 |
Echinococcus multilocularis | nmda type glutamate receptor | 0.0032 | 0.0943 | 0.0943 |
Brugia malayi | Kinesin motor domain containing protein | 0.0029 | 0.082 | 0.6083 |
Trichomonas vaginalis | voltage and ligand gated potassium channel, putative | 0.0038 | 0.1224 | 0.5 |
Echinococcus granulosus | nmda type glutamate receptor | 0.0032 | 0.0943 | 0.0943 |
Schistosoma mansoni | glutamate receptor NMDA | 0.0014 | 0.0084 | 0.0097 |
Giardia lamblia | Kinesin-5 | 0.0029 | 0.082 | 0.5 |
Schistosoma mansoni | voltage-gated potassium channel | 0.0044 | 0.1523 | 0.1765 |
Brugia malayi | Voltage-gated potassium channel, HERG (KCNH2)-related. C. elegans unc-103 ortholog | 0.0041 | 0.1349 | 1 |
Schistosoma mansoni | hypothetical protein | 0.0196 | 0.8629 | 1 |
Echinococcus multilocularis | potassium voltage gated channel subfamily H | 0.0041 | 0.1349 | 0.1349 |
Echinococcus granulosus | glutamate receptor ionotrophic AMPA 3 | 0.0014 | 0.0084 | 0.0084 |
Echinococcus multilocularis | kinesin family 1 | 0.0226 | 1 | 1 |
Echinococcus multilocularis | glutamate receptor, ionotrophic, AMPA 3 | 0.0014 | 0.0084 | 0.0084 |
Treponema pallidum | amino acid ABC transporter, periplasmic binding protein | 0.0023 | 0.0524 | 0.5 |
Plasmodium falciparum | kinesin-5 | 0.0029 | 0.082 | 0.5 |
Schistosoma mansoni | kinesin eg-5 | 0.0029 | 0.082 | 0.0951 |
Mycobacterium ulcerans | glutamine-binding lipoprotein GlnH | 0.0023 | 0.0524 | 0.5 |
Echinococcus multilocularis | glutamate receptor 2 | 0.0014 | 0.0084 | 0.0084 |
Schistosoma mansoni | voltage-gated potassium channel | 0.0044 | 0.1523 | 0.1765 |
Echinococcus multilocularis | Glutamate receptor, ionotropic kainate 2 | 0.0014 | 0.0084 | 0.0084 |
Echinococcus granulosus | potassium voltage gated channel subfamily H | 0.0041 | 0.1349 | 0.1349 |
Echinococcus granulosus | Glutamate receptor ionotropic kainate 2 | 0.0014 | 0.0084 | 0.0084 |
Echinococcus granulosus | Glutamate receptor ionotropic kainate 2 | 0.0014 | 0.0084 | 0.0084 |
Toxoplasma gondii | kinesin motor domain-containing protein | 0.0029 | 0.082 | 0.5 |
Chlamydia trachomatis | arginine ABC transporter substrate-binding protein ArtJ | 0.0023 | 0.0524 | 0.5 |
Loa Loa (eye worm) | hypothetical protein | 0.0035 | 0.1098 | 0.8141 |
Activity type | Activity value | Assay description | Source | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|
Activity (binding) | = 84 % | Potentiation of rat recombinant GluN1/GluN2D expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes assessed as increase in glutamate/glycine-induced current response at 30 uM by two-electrode voltage clamp technique relative to control | ChEMBL. | 24512267 |
Activity (binding) | = 90 % | Potentiation of rat recombinant GluN1/GluN2B expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes assessed as increase in glutamate/glycine-induced current response at 30 uM by two-electrode voltage clamp technique relative to control | ChEMBL. | 24512267 |
Activity (binding) | = 97 % | Potentiation of rat recombinant GluN1/GluN2A expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes assessed as increase in glutamate/glycine-induced current response at 30 uM by two-electrode voltage clamp technique relative to control | ChEMBL. | 24512267 |
Activity (binding) | = 122 % | Potentiation of rat recombinant GluN1/GluN2C expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes assessed as increase in glutamate/glycine-induced current response at 30 uM by two-electrode voltage clamp technique relative to control | ChEMBL. | 24512267 |
EC50 (binding) | = 16 uM | Potentiation of rat recombinant GluN1/GluN2C expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes assessed as increase in glutamate/glycine-induced current response by two-electrode voltage clamp technique relative to control | ChEMBL. | 24512267 |
max activation (binding) | = 131 % | Potentiation of rat recombinant GluN1/GluN2C expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes assessed as increase in glutamate/glycine-induced current response at 30 uM by two-electrode voltage clamp technique relative to control | ChEMBL. | 24512267 |
Many chemical entities in TDR Targets come from high-throughput screenings with whole cells or tissue samples, and not all assayed compounds have been tested against a single a single target protein, probably because they get ruled out during screening process. Even if these compounds may have not been of interest in the original screening, they may come as interesting leads for other screening assays. Furthermore, we may be able to propose drug-target associations using chemical similarities and network patterns.