Species | Potential target | Raw | Global | Species |
---|---|---|---|---|
Echinococcus granulosus | carbonic anhydrase II | 0.0702 | 0.5607 | 1 |
Loa Loa (eye worm) | hypothetical protein | 0.0314 | 0.2358 | 0.4146 |
Echinococcus multilocularis | carbonic anhydrase | 0.0314 | 0.2358 | 0.4082 |
Brugia malayi | Carbonic anhydrase like protein 2 precursor | 0.0314 | 0.2358 | 0.4146 |
Leishmania major | carbonic anhydrase-like protein | 0.0702 | 0.5607 | 1 |
Loa Loa (eye worm) | hypothetical protein | 0.0314 | 0.2358 | 0.4146 |
Schistosoma mansoni | carbonic anhydrase-related | 0.0314 | 0.2358 | 0.4146 |
Brugia malayi | Eukaryotic-type carbonic anhydrase family protein | 0.0702 | 0.5607 | 1 |
Brugia malayi | plexin A | 0.0047 | 0.0117 | 0.0109 |
Echinococcus granulosus | carbonic anhydrase | 0.0314 | 0.2358 | 0.4082 |
Loa Loa (eye worm) | eukaryotic-type carbonic anhydrase | 0.0702 | 0.5607 | 1 |
Loa Loa (eye worm) | carbonic anhydrase 3 | 0.0702 | 0.5607 | 1 |
Entamoeba histolytica | carbonic anhydrase, putative | 0.0508 | 0.3983 | 0.5 |
Brugia malayi | Eukaryotic-type carbonic anhydrase family protein | 0.0314 | 0.2358 | 0.4146 |
Onchocerca volvulus | Putative sulfate transporter | 0.0206 | 0.1447 | 1 |
Chlamydia trachomatis | sulfate transporter | 0.0033 | 0 | 0.5 |
Schistosoma mansoni | carbonic anhydrase II (carbonate dehydratase II) | 0.0702 | 0.5607 | 1 |
Schistosoma mansoni | carbonic anhydrase-related | 0.0314 | 0.2358 | 0.4146 |
Schistosoma mansoni | carbonic anhydrase | 0.0508 | 0.3983 | 0.7074 |
Echinococcus granulosus | carbonic anhydrase | 0.0314 | 0.2358 | 0.4082 |
Brugia malayi | Eukaryotic-type carbonic anhydrase family protein | 0.0314 | 0.2358 | 0.4146 |
Toxoplasma gondii | hypothetical protein | 0.0314 | 0.2358 | 1 |
Schistosoma mansoni | carbonic anhydrase | 0.0314 | 0.2358 | 0.4146 |
Trichomonas vaginalis | conserved hypothetical protein | 0.1227 | 1 | 0.5 |
Echinococcus multilocularis | carbonic anhydrase | 0.0314 | 0.2358 | 0.4082 |
Mycobacterium leprae | CARBONIC ANHYDRASE (CARBONATE DEHYDRATASE) (CARBONIC DEHYDRATASE) | 0.0508 | 0.3983 | 1 |
Echinococcus granulosus | carbonic anhydrase | 0.0314 | 0.2358 | 0.4082 |
Plasmodium falciparum | carbonic anhydrase | 0.0314 | 0.2358 | 1 |
Plasmodium vivax | sulfate transporter, putative | 0.0033 | 0 | 0.5 |
Loa Loa (eye worm) | plexin A | 0.0047 | 0.0117 | 0.0109 |
Brugia malayi | Putative carbonic anhydrase 5 precursor | 0.0702 | 0.5607 | 1 |
Mycobacterium tuberculosis | Probable transmembrane carbonic anhydrase (carbonate dehydratase) (carbonic dehydratase) | 0.0485 | 0.379 | 0.3344 |
Brugia malayi | Eukaryotic-type carbonic anhydrase family protein | 0.0314 | 0.2358 | 0.4146 |
Schistosoma mansoni | carbonic anhydrase II (carbonate dehydratase II) | 0.0702 | 0.5607 | 1 |
Mycobacterium tuberculosis | Beta-carbonic anhydrase | 0.0979 | 0.7923 | 1 |
Loa Loa (eye worm) | eukaryotic-type carbonic anhydrase | 0.0314 | 0.2358 | 0.4146 |
Onchocerca volvulus | 0.0206 | 0.1447 | 1 | |
Echinococcus multilocularis | carbonic anhydrase II | 0.0702 | 0.5607 | 1 |
Echinococcus multilocularis | carbonic anhydrase | 0.0314 | 0.2358 | 0.4082 |
Trypanosoma brucei | carbonic anhydrase-like protein | 0.0702 | 0.5607 | 1 |
Brugia malayi | Carbonic anhydrase like protein 2 precursor | 0.0314 | 0.2358 | 0.4146 |
Schistosoma mansoni | hypothetical protein | 0.0314 | 0.2358 | 0.4146 |
Loa Loa (eye worm) | hypothetical protein | 0.0314 | 0.2358 | 0.4146 |
Mycobacterium ulcerans | carbonic anhydrase | 0.0508 | 0.3983 | 0.3983 |
Trichomonas vaginalis | conserved hypothetical protein | 0.1227 | 1 | 0.5 |
Trypanosoma cruzi | carbonic anhydrase-like protein, putative | 0.0702 | 0.5607 | 1 |
Trypanosoma cruzi | carbonic anhydrase-like protein, putative | 0.0702 | 0.5607 | 1 |
Mycobacterium tuberculosis | Beta-carbonic anhydrase CanB | 0.026 | 0.1906 | 0.031 |
Schistosoma mansoni | carbonic anhydrase-related | 0.0314 | 0.2358 | 0.4146 |
Many chemical entities in TDR Targets come from high-throughput screenings with whole cells or tissue samples, and not all assayed compounds have been tested against a single a single target protein, probably because they get ruled out during screening process. Even if these compounds may have not been of interest in the original screening, they may come as interesting leads for other screening assays. Furthermore, we may be able to propose drug-target associations using chemical similarities and network patterns.