Species | Potential target | Raw | Global | Species |
---|---|---|---|---|
Entamoeba histolytica | protein tyrosine phosphatase, putative | 0.0396 | 0.5389 | 0.5 |
Trichomonas vaginalis | glucosylceramidase, putative | 0.0547 | 0.7732 | 1 |
Trichomonas vaginalis | glucosylceramidase, putative | 0.0359 | 0.481 | 0.5573 |
Entamoeba histolytica | protein tyrosine phosphatase, putative | 0.0396 | 0.5389 | 0.5 |
Loa Loa (eye worm) | RNA recognition domain-containing protein domain-containing protein | 0.0066 | 0.0256 | 0.0331 |
Schistosoma mansoni | tar DNA-binding protein | 0.0066 | 0.0256 | 0.0256 |
Onchocerca volvulus | Glucosylceramidase homolog | 0.0359 | 0.481 | 0.8924 |
Trichomonas vaginalis | glucosylceramidase, putative | 0.0547 | 0.7732 | 1 |
Brugia malayi | Low molecular weight phosphotyrosine protein phosphatase containing protein | 0.0396 | 0.5389 | 0.697 |
Schistosoma mansoni | tar DNA-binding protein | 0.0066 | 0.0256 | 0.0256 |
Trichomonas vaginalis | glucosylceramidase, putative | 0.0359 | 0.481 | 0.5573 |
Schistosoma mansoni | cellular tumor antigen P53 | 0.005 | 0.0007 | 0.0007 |
Echinococcus multilocularis | geminin | 0.0176 | 0.1967 | 0.1967 |
Leishmania major | hypothetical protein, conserved | 0.0122 | 0.1132 | 0.5 |
Mycobacterium tuberculosis | Phosphotyrosine protein phosphatase PtpA (protein-tyrosine-phosphatase) (PTPase) (LMW phosphatase) | 0.0274 | 0.3492 | 0.5 |
Trichomonas vaginalis | glucosylceramidase, putative | 0.0359 | 0.481 | 0.5573 |
Echinococcus granulosus | tar DNA binding protein | 0.0066 | 0.0256 | 0.0256 |
Loa Loa (eye worm) | hypothetical protein | 0.0156 | 0.1653 | 0.2138 |
Trichomonas vaginalis | glucosylceramidase, putative | 0.0359 | 0.481 | 0.5573 |
Trichomonas vaginalis | low molecular weight protein tyrosine phosphatase, putative | 0.0396 | 0.5389 | 0.645 |
Schistosoma mansoni | tar DNA-binding protein | 0.0066 | 0.0256 | 0.0256 |
Schistosoma mansoni | tar DNA-binding protein | 0.0066 | 0.0256 | 0.0256 |
Trichomonas vaginalis | glucosylceramidase, putative | 0.0359 | 0.481 | 0.5573 |
Brugia malayi | Calcitonin receptor-like protein seb-1 | 0.0156 | 0.1653 | 0.2138 |
Trichomonas vaginalis | glucosylceramidase, putative | 0.0547 | 0.7732 | 1 |
Loa Loa (eye worm) | phosphotyrosine protein phosphatase | 0.0396 | 0.5389 | 0.697 |
Brugia malayi | RNA recognition motif domain containing protein | 0.0066 | 0.0256 | 0.0331 |
Trypanosoma cruzi | hypothetical protein, conserved | 0.0122 | 0.1132 | 0.5 |
Mycobacterium ulcerans | phosphotyrosine protein phosphatase PtpA | 0.0396 | 0.5389 | 0.5 |
Loa Loa (eye worm) | TAR-binding protein | 0.0066 | 0.0256 | 0.0331 |
Loa Loa (eye worm) | transcription factor SMAD2 | 0.0249 | 0.3101 | 0.401 |
Trichomonas vaginalis | glucosylceramidase, putative | 0.0359 | 0.481 | 0.5573 |
Loa Loa (eye worm) | hypothetical protein | 0.005 | 0.0007 | 0.0008 |
Echinococcus granulosus | geminin | 0.0176 | 0.1967 | 0.1967 |
Loa Loa (eye worm) | O-glycosyl hydrolase family 30 protein | 0.0547 | 0.7732 | 1 |
Echinococcus multilocularis | microtubule associated protein 2 | 0.0693 | 1 | 1 |
Onchocerca volvulus | 0.0396 | 0.5389 | 1 | |
Trypanosoma cruzi | hypothetical protein, conserved | 0.0122 | 0.1132 | 0.5 |
Loa Loa (eye worm) | pigment dispersing factor receptor c | 0.0156 | 0.1653 | 0.2138 |
Loa Loa (eye worm) | MH2 domain-containing protein | 0.0249 | 0.3101 | 0.401 |
Trichomonas vaginalis | glucosylceramidase, putative | 0.0547 | 0.7732 | 1 |
Schistosoma mansoni | microtubule-associated protein tau | 0.0693 | 1 | 1 |
Trypanosoma brucei | low molecular weight protein tyrosine phosphatase, putative | 0.0122 | 0.1132 | 0.5 |
Brugia malayi | latrophilin 2 splice variant baaae | 0.0106 | 0.0888 | 0.1148 |
Trichomonas vaginalis | low molecular weight protein tyrosine phosphatase, putative | 0.0396 | 0.5389 | 0.645 |
Brugia malayi | O-Glycosyl hydrolase family 30 protein | 0.0547 | 0.7732 | 1 |
Echinococcus multilocularis | tumor protein p63 | 0.0339 | 0.4506 | 0.4506 |
Giardia lamblia | Low molecular weight protein-tyrosine-phosphatase | 0.0396 | 0.5389 | 0.5 |
Schistosoma mansoni | tar DNA-binding protein | 0.0066 | 0.0256 | 0.0256 |
Loa Loa (eye worm) | hypothetical protein | 0.0106 | 0.0888 | 0.1148 |
Echinococcus granulosus | tumor protein p63 | 0.0339 | 0.4506 | 0.4506 |
Trichomonas vaginalis | glucosylceramidase, putative | 0.0378 | 0.511 | 0.6028 |
Trichomonas vaginalis | glucosylceramidase, putative | 0.0547 | 0.7732 | 1 |
Schistosoma mansoni | hypothetical protein | 0.0176 | 0.1967 | 0.1967 |
Trichomonas vaginalis | low molecular weight protein tyrosine phosphatase, putative | 0.0396 | 0.5389 | 0.645 |
Brugia malayi | Corticotropin releasing factor receptor 2 precursor, putative | 0.0156 | 0.1653 | 0.2138 |
Loa Loa (eye worm) | RNA binding protein | 0.0066 | 0.0256 | 0.0331 |
Trichomonas vaginalis | glucosylceramidase, putative | 0.0378 | 0.511 | 0.6028 |
Trichomonas vaginalis | low molecular weight protein-tyrosine-phosphatase, putative | 0.0396 | 0.5389 | 0.645 |
Brugia malayi | RNA binding protein | 0.0066 | 0.0256 | 0.0331 |
Schistosoma mansoni | hypothetical protein | 0.0106 | 0.0888 | 0.0888 |
Echinococcus multilocularis | tar DNA binding protein | 0.0066 | 0.0256 | 0.0256 |
Trichomonas vaginalis | low molecular weight protein-tyrosine-phosphatase, putative | 0.0396 | 0.5389 | 0.645 |
Trichomonas vaginalis | low molecular weight protein-tyrosine-phosphatase, putative | 0.0396 | 0.5389 | 0.645 |
Trichomonas vaginalis | glucosylceramidase, putative | 0.0359 | 0.481 | 0.5573 |
Brugia malayi | MH2 domain containing protein | 0.0249 | 0.3101 | 0.401 |
Brugia malayi | TAR-binding protein | 0.0066 | 0.0256 | 0.0331 |
Schistosoma mansoni | hypothetical protein | 0.0176 | 0.1967 | 0.1967 |
Trichomonas vaginalis | glucosylceramidase, putative | 0.0547 | 0.7732 | 1 |
Many chemical entities in TDR Targets come from high-throughput screenings with whole cells or tissue samples, and not all assayed compounds have been tested against a single a single target protein, probably because they get ruled out during screening process. Even if these compounds may have not been of interest in the original screening, they may come as interesting leads for other screening assays. Furthermore, we may be able to propose drug-target associations using chemical similarities and network patterns.