Species | Potential target | Raw | Global | Species |
---|---|---|---|---|
Trichomonas vaginalis | glucosylceramidase, putative | 0.0359 | 0.481 | 0.5573 |
Echinococcus granulosus | tar DNA binding protein | 0.0066 | 0.0256 | 0.0256 |
Schistosoma mansoni | hypothetical protein | 0.0176 | 0.1967 | 0.1967 |
Trichomonas vaginalis | glucosylceramidase, putative | 0.0359 | 0.481 | 0.5573 |
Giardia lamblia | Low molecular weight protein-tyrosine-phosphatase | 0.0396 | 0.5389 | 0.5 |
Trichomonas vaginalis | glucosylceramidase, putative | 0.0359 | 0.481 | 0.5573 |
Schistosoma mansoni | cellular tumor antigen P53 | 0.005 | 0.0007 | 0.0007 |
Schistosoma mansoni | tar DNA-binding protein | 0.0066 | 0.0256 | 0.0256 |
Echinococcus granulosus | tumor protein p63 | 0.0339 | 0.4506 | 0.4506 |
Trichomonas vaginalis | low molecular weight protein tyrosine phosphatase, putative | 0.0396 | 0.5389 | 0.645 |
Loa Loa (eye worm) | O-glycosyl hydrolase family 30 protein | 0.0547 | 0.7732 | 1 |
Loa Loa (eye worm) | TAR-binding protein | 0.0066 | 0.0256 | 0.0331 |
Brugia malayi | TAR-binding protein | 0.0066 | 0.0256 | 0.0331 |
Echinococcus multilocularis | geminin | 0.0176 | 0.1967 | 0.1967 |
Echinococcus multilocularis | tar DNA binding protein | 0.0066 | 0.0256 | 0.0256 |
Entamoeba histolytica | protein tyrosine phosphatase, putative | 0.0396 | 0.5389 | 0.5 |
Loa Loa (eye worm) | RNA recognition domain-containing protein domain-containing protein | 0.0066 | 0.0256 | 0.0331 |
Loa Loa (eye worm) | pigment dispersing factor receptor c | 0.0156 | 0.1653 | 0.2138 |
Loa Loa (eye worm) | hypothetical protein | 0.005 | 0.0007 | 0.0008 |
Onchocerca volvulus | 0.0396 | 0.5389 | 1 | |
Trichomonas vaginalis | low molecular weight protein tyrosine phosphatase, putative | 0.0396 | 0.5389 | 0.645 |
Trichomonas vaginalis | low molecular weight protein-tyrosine-phosphatase, putative | 0.0396 | 0.5389 | 0.645 |
Brugia malayi | Corticotropin releasing factor receptor 2 precursor, putative | 0.0156 | 0.1653 | 0.2138 |
Schistosoma mansoni | tar DNA-binding protein | 0.0066 | 0.0256 | 0.0256 |
Brugia malayi | latrophilin 2 splice variant baaae | 0.0106 | 0.0888 | 0.1148 |
Loa Loa (eye worm) | RNA binding protein | 0.0066 | 0.0256 | 0.0331 |
Brugia malayi | MH2 domain containing protein | 0.0249 | 0.3101 | 0.401 |
Trichomonas vaginalis | low molecular weight protein tyrosine phosphatase, putative | 0.0396 | 0.5389 | 0.645 |
Brugia malayi | Low molecular weight phosphotyrosine protein phosphatase containing protein | 0.0396 | 0.5389 | 0.697 |
Schistosoma mansoni | hypothetical protein | 0.0176 | 0.1967 | 0.1967 |
Trichomonas vaginalis | glucosylceramidase, putative | 0.0359 | 0.481 | 0.5573 |
Schistosoma mansoni | tar DNA-binding protein | 0.0066 | 0.0256 | 0.0256 |
Loa Loa (eye worm) | transcription factor SMAD2 | 0.0249 | 0.3101 | 0.401 |
Schistosoma mansoni | microtubule-associated protein tau | 0.0693 | 1 | 1 |
Leishmania major | hypothetical protein, conserved | 0.0122 | 0.1132 | 0.5 |
Mycobacterium ulcerans | phosphotyrosine protein phosphatase PtpA | 0.0396 | 0.5389 | 0.5 |
Echinococcus granulosus | geminin | 0.0176 | 0.1967 | 0.1967 |
Trichomonas vaginalis | low molecular weight protein-tyrosine-phosphatase, putative | 0.0396 | 0.5389 | 0.645 |
Brugia malayi | O-Glycosyl hydrolase family 30 protein | 0.0547 | 0.7732 | 1 |
Trichomonas vaginalis | glucosylceramidase, putative | 0.0359 | 0.481 | 0.5573 |
Loa Loa (eye worm) | hypothetical protein | 0.0106 | 0.0888 | 0.1148 |
Trypanosoma cruzi | hypothetical protein, conserved | 0.0122 | 0.1132 | 0.5 |
Loa Loa (eye worm) | phosphotyrosine protein phosphatase | 0.0396 | 0.5389 | 0.697 |
Trichomonas vaginalis | glucosylceramidase, putative | 0.0547 | 0.7732 | 1 |
Trichomonas vaginalis | glucosylceramidase, putative | 0.0378 | 0.511 | 0.6028 |
Trypanosoma brucei | low molecular weight protein tyrosine phosphatase, putative | 0.0122 | 0.1132 | 0.5 |
Schistosoma mansoni | hypothetical protein | 0.0106 | 0.0888 | 0.0888 |
Onchocerca volvulus | Glucosylceramidase homolog | 0.0359 | 0.481 | 0.8924 |
Echinococcus multilocularis | microtubule associated protein 2 | 0.0693 | 1 | 1 |
Brugia malayi | RNA recognition motif domain containing protein | 0.0066 | 0.0256 | 0.0331 |
Trichomonas vaginalis | glucosylceramidase, putative | 0.0547 | 0.7732 | 1 |
Trichomonas vaginalis | glucosylceramidase, putative | 0.0547 | 0.7732 | 1 |
Schistosoma mansoni | tar DNA-binding protein | 0.0066 | 0.0256 | 0.0256 |
Entamoeba histolytica | protein tyrosine phosphatase, putative | 0.0396 | 0.5389 | 0.5 |
Trichomonas vaginalis | glucosylceramidase, putative | 0.0359 | 0.481 | 0.5573 |
Trichomonas vaginalis | glucosylceramidase, putative | 0.0547 | 0.7732 | 1 |
Trichomonas vaginalis | low molecular weight protein-tyrosine-phosphatase, putative | 0.0396 | 0.5389 | 0.645 |
Trypanosoma cruzi | hypothetical protein, conserved | 0.0122 | 0.1132 | 0.5 |
Schistosoma mansoni | tar DNA-binding protein | 0.0066 | 0.0256 | 0.0256 |
Loa Loa (eye worm) | MH2 domain-containing protein | 0.0249 | 0.3101 | 0.401 |
Trichomonas vaginalis | glucosylceramidase, putative | 0.0547 | 0.7732 | 1 |
Mycobacterium tuberculosis | Phosphotyrosine protein phosphatase PtpA (protein-tyrosine-phosphatase) (PTPase) (LMW phosphatase) | 0.0274 | 0.3492 | 0.5 |
Brugia malayi | Calcitonin receptor-like protein seb-1 | 0.0156 | 0.1653 | 0.2138 |
Trichomonas vaginalis | glucosylceramidase, putative | 0.0378 | 0.511 | 0.6028 |
Echinococcus multilocularis | tumor protein p63 | 0.0339 | 0.4506 | 0.4506 |
Trichomonas vaginalis | glucosylceramidase, putative | 0.0547 | 0.7732 | 1 |
Loa Loa (eye worm) | hypothetical protein | 0.0156 | 0.1653 | 0.2138 |
Brugia malayi | RNA binding protein | 0.0066 | 0.0256 | 0.0331 |
Trichomonas vaginalis | glucosylceramidase, putative | 0.0359 | 0.481 | 0.5573 |
Many chemical entities in TDR Targets come from high-throughput screenings with whole cells or tissue samples, and not all assayed compounds have been tested against a single a single target protein, probably because they get ruled out during screening process. Even if these compounds may have not been of interest in the original screening, they may come as interesting leads for other screening assays. Furthermore, we may be able to propose drug-target associations using chemical similarities and network patterns.