Species | Target name | Source | Bibliographic reference |
---|---|---|---|
Homo sapiens | butyrylcholinesterase | Starlite/ChEMBL | References |
Homo sapiens | acetylcholinesterase (Yt blood group) | Starlite/ChEMBL | References |
Rattus norvegicus | Muscarinic acetylcholine receptor M2 | Starlite/ChEMBL | References |
Mus musculus | cholinergic receptor, muscarinic 1, CNS | Starlite/ChEMBL | References |
Species | Potential target | Raw | Global | Species |
---|---|---|---|---|
Loa Loa (eye worm) | TK/ALK protein kinase | 0.3944 | 0.9996 | 1 |
Schistosoma mansoni | hypothetical protein | 0.0465 | 0.0661 | 1 |
Brugia malayi | Protein kinase domain containing protein | 0.2575 | 0.6323 | 0.6323 |
Loa Loa (eye worm) | hypothetical protein | 0.2512 | 0.6153 | 0.6155 |
Loa Loa (eye worm) | TK/KIN16 protein kinase | 0.0227 | 0.0022 | 0.0022 |
Loa Loa (eye worm) | TK protein kinase | 0.2575 | 0.6323 | 0.6325 |
Echinococcus multilocularis | MAM | 0.0465 | 0.0661 | 0.1045 |
Loa Loa (eye worm) | hypothetical protein | 0.0465 | 0.0661 | 0.0661 |
Schistosoma mansoni | hypothetical protein | 0.0465 | 0.0661 | 1 |
Brugia malayi | hypothetical protein | 0.0465 | 0.0661 | 0.0661 |
Loa Loa (eye worm) | hypothetical protein | 0.0465 | 0.0661 | 0.0661 |
Echinococcus granulosus | MAM | 0.0465 | 0.0661 | 0.1045 |
Loa Loa (eye worm) | hypothetical protein | 0.0465 | 0.0661 | 0.0661 |
Brugia malayi | Immunoglobulin I-set domain containing protein | 0.0227 | 0.0022 | 0.0022 |
Echinococcus granulosus | tyrosine protein kinase | 0.2575 | 0.6323 | 1 |
Echinococcus multilocularis | tyrosine protein kinase | 0.2575 | 0.6323 | 1 |
Onchocerca volvulus | 0.052 | 0.0809 | 1 | |
Loa Loa (eye worm) | hypothetical protein | 0.3416 | 0.8579 | 0.8582 |
Activity type | Activity value | Assay description | Source | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|
Approx. lethal dose (ADMET) | > 150 | Approximate lethal dose in mice. | ChEMBL. | 1507203 |
Change from control (functional) | = 103.2 % | Percent change in brain Acetylcholine content in the mouse brain using GC/MS methodology. | ChEMBL. | 1507203 |
Change from control (functional) | = 103.2 % | Percent change in brain Acetylcholine content in the mouse brain using GC/MS methodology. | ChEMBL. | 1507203 |
IC50 (binding) | = 0.38 uM | Inhibition of [3H]-N-methylscopolamine to rat muscarinic acetylcholine receptor M2 from heart tissue | ChEMBL. | 1507203 |
IC50 (binding) | = 0.38 uM | Inhibition of [3H]-N-methylscopolamine to rat muscarinic acetylcholine receptor M2 from heart tissue | ChEMBL. | 1507203 |
IC50 (binding) | = 0.52 uM | In vitro inhibition of human acetylcholinesterase. | ChEMBL. | 1507203 |
IC50 (binding) | = 0.52 uM | In vitro inhibition of human acetylcholinesterase. | ChEMBL. | 1507203 |
IC50 (binding) | = 0.67 uM | Inhibition of [3H]-pirenzepine binding to mouse muscarinic acetylcholine receptor M1 from cerebral cortex | ChEMBL. | 1507203 |
IC50 (binding) | = 0.67 uM | Inhibition of [3H]-pirenzepine binding to mouse muscarinic acetylcholine receptor M1 from cerebral cortex | ChEMBL. | 1507203 |
IC50 (binding) | = 1.4 uM | In vitro inhibition of human butryl cholinesterase. | ChEMBL. | 1507203 |
IC50 (binding) | = 1.4 uM | In vitro inhibition of human butryl cholinesterase. | ChEMBL. | 1507203 |
Ileal activity (functional) | < 0.01 uM | Concentration of the compound required to potentiate the contraction of isolated rat ileum produced by 1 x 10 e -7 M Ach by 20 % | ChEMBL. | 1507203 |
Ratio (binding) | = 0.57 | Ratio of IC50 (muscarinic acetylcholine receptor M2) to IC50 (muscarinic acetylcholine receptor M1) | ChEMBL. | 1507203 |
Ratio (binding) | = 2.8 | Ratio of IC50(BChE-I) to IC50(AChE-I) | ChEMBL. | 1507203 |
Many chemical entities in TDR Targets come from high-throughput screenings with whole cells or tissue samples, and not all assayed compounds have been tested against a single a single target protein, probably because they get ruled out during screening process. Even if these compounds may have not been of interest in the original screening, they may come as interesting leads for other screening assays. Furthermore, we may be able to propose drug-target associations using chemical similarities and network patterns.
1 literature reference was collected for this gene.