Species | Target name | Source | Bibliographic reference |
---|---|---|---|
Rattus norvegicus | Beta-3 adrenergic receptor | Starlite/ChEMBL | References |
Rattus norvegicus | Beta-2 adrenergic receptor | Starlite/ChEMBL | References |
Activity type | Activity value | Assay description | Source | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|
-Log EC20 (functional) | = 5.89 | Increase in BPM in isolated rat atria. | ChEMBL. | 11311067 |
-Log EC20 (functional) | = 5.89 | Increase in BPM in isolated rat atria. | ChEMBL. | 11311067 |
-Log EC50 (functional) | = 7.21 | Agonistic activity towards beta-3 adrenoceptor. Mean concentration required to produce 50% relaxation of detrusor before the addition of the compound in the ferret detrusor | ChEMBL. | 11311067 |
-Log IC50 (functional) | = 5.89 | Agonistic activity towards beta-2 adrenoceptor. Mean concentration required to produce 50% inhibition of uterine contraction | ChEMBL. | 11311067 |
EC50 (functional) | = 7.21 | Agonistic activity towards beta-3 adrenoceptor. Mean concentration required to produce 50% relaxation of detrusor before the addition of the compound in the ferret detrusor | ChEMBL. | 11311067 |
IC50 (functional) | = 5.89 | Agonistic activity towards beta-2 adrenoceptor. Mean concentration required to produce 50% inhibition of uterine contraction | ChEMBL. | 11311067 |
Intrinsic activity (functional) | = 0.83 | Activity compared to that observed following forskolin (10e -5). | ChEMBL. | 11311067 |
Intrinsic activity (functional) | = 0.83 | Activity compared to that observed following forskolin (10e -5). | ChEMBL. | 11311067 |
Selectivity (functional) | = 21 | Concentration ratio of beta1 (EC50) to beta3 (EC50) | ChEMBL. | 11311067 |
Selectivity (functional) | = 21 | Concentration ratio of beta2 (EC50) to beta3 (EC50) | ChEMBL. | 11311067 |
Many chemical entities in TDR Targets come from high-throughput screenings with whole cells or tissue samples, and not all assayed compounds have been tested against a single a single target protein, probably because they get ruled out during screening process. Even if these compounds may have not been of interest in the original screening, they may come as interesting leads for other screening assays. Furthermore, we may be able to propose drug-target associations using chemical similarities and network patterns.
1 literature reference was collected for this gene.